IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/doi10.1086-670393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Judging Product Effectiveness from Perceived Spatial Proximity

Author

Listed:
  • Boyoun (Grace) Chae
  • Xiuping Li
  • Rui (Juliet) Zhu

Abstract

This article demonstrates that the spatial proximity between visual representations of cause and effect in an advertisement can influence consumers' judgments of the product effectiveness. Five studies show that the more proximal is the distance between the image of a potential cause (e.g., a facial cream that treats acne) and that of the potential effect (e.g., a smooth face), the more effective the product is judged to be. The reliance on spatial proximity is an intuitive reasoning process based on the "closeness is strength of effect" metaphor, which is a key characteristic in mechanical causal processes. This reliance on spatial proximity is weakened when consumers are more (vs. less) knowledgeable about a product domain, when they are primed with nonmechanical causal processes, or when they are expecting the effect to happen with a time delay.

Suggested Citation

  • Boyoun (Grace) Chae & Xiuping Li & Rui (Juliet) Zhu, 2013. "Judging Product Effectiveness from Perceived Spatial Proximity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(2), pages 317-335.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/670393
    DOI: 10.1086/670393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/670393
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/670393
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/670393?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Haizhong & Shen, Manqiong & (Amy) Song, Yiping & Phau, Ian, 2020. "Do up-displayed eco-friendly products always perform better? The moderating role of psychological distance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 198-212.
    2. Tok, Dickson & Chen, Xi & Chu, Xing-Yu (Marcos), 2021. "“I Want It! Can I Get It?” How product-model spatial distance and ad appeal affect product evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 454-463.
    3. Ahmad, Fayez & Guzmán, Francisco & Al-Emran, Md, 2024. "Brand activism and the consequence of woke washing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    4. Dai, Bo & Pelton, Lou E., 2018. "Exploring consumers’ skincare retail patronage," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 269-277.
    5. Kevin L. Sample & Henrik Hagtvedt & S. Adam Brasel, 2020. "Components of visual perception in marketing contexts: a conceptual framework and review," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 405-421, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/670393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.