IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v7y2011i3p651-670..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Too Many Unnecessary Merger Notifications In Ireland?

Author

Listed:
  • Paul K. Gorecki

Abstract

The market for corporate control plays an important role in ensuring that assets are deployed in an efficient and effective manner. However, on occasion, mergers might lead to a reduction in competition and a consequent rise in prices and/or other anticompetitive effects. Ireland's Competition Act 2002 provides that all mergers that meet certain financial thresholds must be notified to Ireland's Competition Authority so that they are subject to a competitive effects assessment. However, there are concerns that the notification thresholds result in many mergers with little or no nexus to Ireland being notified. While it is the case that the vast majority of merger notifications do not raise competition concerns, Ireland is not out of line with other jurisdictions that have mandatory notification thresholds such as the European Union and the United States. Nevertheless, that should not lead to complacency. This article quantifies the impact of reforms made in 2006 and 2007 by the Competition Authority and the Minister of Enterprise, Trade and Employment to Ireland's merger notification thresholds. The evidence suggests that these tighter, better specified thresholds led to a reduction of at least 40 to 50 percent in the number of merger notifications. However, more could be done, albeit probably to a lesser extent than the earlier reforms. Applying the International Competition Network's Recommended Practices for Merger Notification Procedures, a series of proposals are made in this article for revising the merger notification thresholds to better select mergers with a nexus to Ireland. Such moves should facilitate a more effective and efficient market for merger control by reducing transaction costs involved in the merger process as well as allowing Competition Authority resources to be deployed elsewhere, a not inconsiderable advantage in a period of austerity.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul K. Gorecki, 2011. "Too Many Unnecessary Merger Notifications In Ireland?," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 651-670.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:7:y:2011:i:3:p:651-670.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhr008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gorecki, Paul, 2021. "Reforming Non-Notifiable Mergers in Ireland: the Kantar Media/Newsaccess Transaction," MPRA Paper 106640, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:7:y:2011:i:3:p:651-670.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.