IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jafrec/v10y2001i4p433-469..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘The Rich Are Just Like Us, Only Richer’: Poverty Functions or Consumption Functions?

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Appleton

Abstract

The reduced form determinants of economic welfare, proxied by consumption, are modelled using the first nationally representative household survey of Uganda. It is investigated whether anything is gained by modelling poverty rather than welfare, when poverty is measured by the poverty gap. Parameters from the tobit poverty function are found to be generally similar to those from consumption functions, indicating that the poor receive comparable rates of return on their assets to the non‐poor. The main exception is that the return to labour is significantly lower for the poor, even with many controls.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Appleton, 2001. "‘The Rich Are Just Like Us, Only Richer’: Poverty Functions or Consumption Functions?," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 10(4), pages 433-469.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:10:y:2001:i:4:p:433-469.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jae/10.4.433
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Appleton, Simon & Song, Lina & Xia, Qingjie, 2010. "Growing out of Poverty: Trends and Patterns of Urban Poverty in China 1988-2002," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 665-678, May.
    2. Deininger, Klaus & Mpuga, Paul, 2004. "Economic and Welfare Effects of the Abolition of Health User Fees : Evidence from Uganda," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3276, The World Bank.
    3. Walker, Thomas S. & Tschirley, David L. & Low, Jan W. & Tanque, M. Pequentino & Boughton, Duncan & Payongayong, Ellen M. & Weber, Michael T., 2004. "Determinants of Rural Income, Poverty, and Perceived Well-Being in Mozambique in 2001-2002," Food Security Collaborative Working Papers 56061, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    4. Paola A. Barrientos Q. & Niels-Hugo Blunch & Nabanita Datta Gupta, 2015. "Income Convergence and the Flow out of Poverty in India, 1994-2005," Economics Working Papers 2015-09, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    5. Andersson, Magnus & Engvall, Anders & Kokko, Ari, 2006. "Determinants Of Poverty In Lao Pdr," EIJS Working Paper Series 223, Stockholm School of Economics, The European Institute of Japanese Studies.
    6. Tilman Br�ck, 2004. "The Welfare Effects of Farm Household Activity Choices in Post-War Mozambique," HiCN Working Papers 04, Households in Conflict Network.
    7. Paul Makdissi & Dorothée Boccanfuso & Mathieu Audet, 2006. "The Geographic Determinants of Poverty in Albania," Cahiers de recherche 06-12, Departement d'économique de l'École de gestion à l'Université de Sherbrooke.
    8. Svensson, Jakob & Björkman Nyqvist, Martina, 2007. "Power to the People: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment of a Community-Based Monitoring Project in Uganda," CEPR Discussion Papers 6344, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Kirsten Ludi, 2006. "Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?," Working Papers 200602, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    10. Björkman, Martina & Reinikka, Ritva & Svensson, Jakob, 2006. "Local Accountability," Seminar Papers 749, Stockholm University, Institute for International Economic Studies.
    11. Sten Dieden, 2004. "Homing in on the Core – Households Incomes, Income Sources and Geography in South Africa," Working Papers 04090, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:10:y:2001:i:4:p:433-469.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csaoxuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.