IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indlaw/v52y2023i2p409-450..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nothing to Lose but Their Restraints of Trade: Lessons for Employment Non-Compete Clauses from EU Competition Law

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Mcmahon
  • Alan Eustace

Abstract

Courts on both sides of the Irish Sea have handed down significant judgments in the field of post-employment restrictive covenants in recent years. This article argues that these cases expose the common law rules on restraint of trade as fundamentally inadequate for regulating non-compete clauses in the modern economy. Ultimately, the scope of these restrictive covenants can only be determined by examining the nature of the relevant market and defining the previous employer’s competitors. This article argues that courts should make full use of methods developed by EU competition law to define the limits of the relevant market, identify the competitors of the previous employer and assess the scale of the restraint. Although this method cannot fully determine the reasonableness of a non-compete clause, it would lead to more effective and systematic treatment of non-compete clauses that considerably improves upon the pragmatic and incompletely theorised approach currently taken by courts in both Ireland and the UK.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Mcmahon & Alan Eustace, 2023. "Nothing to Lose but Their Restraints of Trade: Lessons for Employment Non-Compete Clauses from EU Competition Law," Industrial Law Journal, Industrial Law Society, vol. 52(2), pages 409-450.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:52:y:2023:i:2:p:409-450.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/indlaw/dwac025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:52:y:2023:i:2:p:409-450.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ilj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.