IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indlaw/v52y2023i2p342-370..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Expansion of Wage Theft Legislation in Common Law Countries—Should Ireland be Next?

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle O’Sullivan

Abstract

While employment laws exist to protect workers from the unfair exploitation, evidence suggests that wage theft is a prominent practice. Wage theft has received considerable public policy attention in several common law countries leading to the introduction of new legislation on the basis that existing legal regulations were inadequate and because the effects of wage theft are particularly deleterious for low-wage workers. Wage theft though remains underexplored in an Irish policy context. This article examines whether Ireland needs stronger laws to address wage theft by assessing if existing minimum wage and working time employment legislation provide an effective remedy for workers. The analysis finds that Irish laws already contain many provisions which new wage theft laws in other jurisdictions have introduced, suggesting radically new legislation is not needed. Several features of existing laws though obstruct workers in seeking remedy for underpayments and require amendment. Changing legislation, however, will likely be insufficient for an effective enforcement regime and it must be supplemented by statutory support for collective representation and enhancing labour inspectorate capacity to act on workers’ behalf.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle O’Sullivan, 2023. "The Expansion of Wage Theft Legislation in Common Law Countries—Should Ireland be Next?," Industrial Law Journal, Industrial Law Society, vol. 52(2), pages 342-370.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:52:y:2023:i:2:p:342-370.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/indlaw/dwac019
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:52:y:2023:i:2:p:342-370.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ilj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.