IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v8y1999i3p487-517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

'Intermediate Organization' Revisited: A Framework for the Vertical Division of Labor in Manufacturing and the Case of the Japanese Assembly Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Hemmert, Martin

Abstract

This paper develops a framework that distinguishes five types of organization for the vertical division of labor between manufacturing firms: market transactions, recurrent transactions, interdependent transactions, quasi-integration and formal integration. The application of this framework to the Japanese assembly industries shows that (i) components suppliers are quasi-integrated in Japan, in contrast to formal integration in the West, and (ii) transactions with parts makers are mostly interdependent in Japan, compared with recurrent transactions in Western countries. These findings are explained by differences in the institutional setting and have resulted in a competitive advantage for the Japanese assembly industries throughout several decades. Recently, however, the structural difference relative to Western countries seems to be diminishing gradually due to the globalization of manufacturing firms in these industries. Copyright 1999 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Hemmert, Martin, 1999. "'Intermediate Organization' Revisited: A Framework for the Vertical Division of Labor in Manufacturing and the Case of the Japanese Assembly Industries," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 8(3), pages 487-517, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:8:y:1999:i:3:p:487-517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lisa De Propris & Ping Wei, 2007. "Governance and Competitiveness in the Birmingham Jewellery District," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(12), pages 2465-2486, November.
    2. Jar-Der Luo & Ke Rong & Kunhao Yang & Rong Guo & YaQi Zou, 2019. "Syndication through social embeddedness: A comparison of foreign, private and state-owned venture capital (VC) firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 499-527, June.
    3. Chan, Jin Hooi & Reiner, David, 2019. "Evolution in inter-firm governance along the transport biofuel value chain in Maritime Silk Road countries," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 268-282.
    4. Matsushima, Noriaki & Mizuno, Tomomichi, 2013. "Vertical separation as a defense against strong suppliers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 208-216.
    5. Noriaki Matsushima & Tomomichi Mizuno, 2010. "How do market structures affect decisions on vertical integration/separation?," ISER Discussion Paper 0770, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    6. Wang, Yue & Tanaka, Akira, 2011. "From hierarchy to hybrid: The evolving nature of inter-firm governance in China's automobile groups," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 74-80, January.
    7. Noriaki Matsushima & Tomomichi Mizuno, 2007. "Why do large firms tend to integrate vertically? - asymmetric vertical integration reconsidered -," Discussion Papers 2007-34, Kobe University, Graduate School of Business Administration.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:8:y:1999:i:3:p:487-517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.