IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021i4p671-680..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mentally Challenging Occupations Are Associated With More Rapid Cognitive Decline at Later Stages of Cognitive Aging

Author

Listed:
  • Jinshil Hyun
  • Mindy J Katz
  • Richard B Lipton
  • Martin J Sliwinski
  • Angela Gutchess

Abstract

ObjectivesEngaging in mentally challenging activities is associated with reduced risk for cognitive impairment and dementia; however, its association with rates of cognitive decline has been inconsistent. The aim of this study is to test whether working in mentally challenging occupations is related to rates of cognitive change at later older adulthood.MethodThe sample consisted of 1,520 individuals (baseline mean age = 78.6 ± 5.1, range = 64–100) from the Einstein Aging Study. Occupation information of each participant was collected retrospectively and linked with the substantive complexity of work score from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. Cognitive changes in memory, speed, and executive function (EF) domains were represented using two time metrics (i.e., time from retirement, time from study enrollment).ResultsResults from mixed models showed that occupational complexity was associated with significantly faster rates of cognitive decline in speed and EF in the “time from retirement” model but not in the “time from baseline” model. Despite faster cognitive loss, the protective effect of occupational complexity persisted for decades after retirement due to higher initial levels of cognition.DiscussionThe result suggests that protective factors for cognitive health may be associated with delayed onset but more rapid cognitive decline afterwards at later stages of cognitive aging.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinshil Hyun & Mindy J Katz & Richard B Lipton & Martin J Sliwinski & Angela Gutchess, 2021. "Mentally Challenging Occupations Are Associated With More Rapid Cognitive Decline at Later Stages of Cognitive Aging," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(4), pages 671-680.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:4:p:671-680.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz122
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:4:p:671-680.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.