IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021i1p121-132..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe
[Demography of informal caregiving]

Author

Listed:
  • Ginevra Floridi
  • Ludovico Carrino
  • Karen Glaser
  • Candace Kemp

Abstract

ObjectivesWe examine whether socioeconomic inequalities in home-care use among disabled older adults are related to the contextual characteristics of long-term care (LTC) systems. Specifically, we investigate how wealth and income gradients in the use of informal, formal, and mixed home-care vary according to the degree to which LTC systems offer alternatives to families as the main providers of care (“de-familization”).MethodWe use survey data from SHARE on disabled older adults from 136 administrative regions in 12 European countries and link them to a regional indicator of de-familization in LTC, measured by the number of available LTC beds in care homes. We use multinomial multilevel models, with and without country fixed-effects, to study home-care use as a function of individual-level and regional-level LTC characteristics. We interact financial wealth and income with the number of LTC beds to assess whether socioeconomic gradients in home-care use differ across regions according to the degree of de-familization in LTC.ResultsWe find robust evidence that socioeconomic status inequalities in the use of mixed-care are lower in more de-familized LTC systems. Poorer people are more likely than the wealthier to combine informal and formal home-care use in regions with more LTC beds. SES inequalities in the exclusive use of informal or formal care do not differ by the level of de-familization.DiscussionThe results suggest that de-familization in LTC favors the combination of formal and informal home-care among the more socioeconomically disadvantaged, potentially mitigating health inequalities in later life.

Suggested Citation

  • Ginevra Floridi & Ludovico Carrino & Karen Glaser & Candace Kemp, 2021. "Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe [Demography of informal caregiving]," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(1), pages 121-132.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:1:p:121-132.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaa139
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joan Costa‐Font & Edward C. Norton & Luigi Siciliani & Vincenzo Carrieri & Cinzia Di Novi & Cristina Elisa Orso, 2017. "Home Sweet Home? Public Financing and Inequalities in the Use of Home Care Services in Europe," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 38, pages 445-468, September.
    2. Marco Albertini & Emmanuele Pavolini, 2017. "Unequal Inequalities: The Stratification of the Use of Formal Care Among Older Europeans," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(3), pages 510-521.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bertin, Giovanni & Carrino, Ludovico & Pantalone, Marta, 2021. "Do standard classifications still represent European welfare typologies? Novel evidence from studies on health and social care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    2. Verhagen, Mark D., 2023. "Using machine learning to monitor the equity of large-scale policy interventions: The Dutch decentralisation of the Social Domain," SocArXiv qzm7y, Center for Open Science.
    3. Bo Hu & Javiera Cartagena-Farias & Nicola Brimblecombe, 2022. "Functional disability and utilisation of long-term care in the older population in England: a dual trajectory analysis," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1363-1373, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maja Matanic Vautmans & Marijana Oreb & Sasa Drezgic, 2023. "Socioeconomic inequality in the use of long-term care for the elderly in Europe," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 47(2), pages 149-176.
    2. Ginevra Floridi & Nekehia T Quashie & Karen Glaser & Martina Brand, 2022. "Partner Care Arrangements and Well-Being in Mid- and Later Life: The Role of Gender Across Care Contexts [Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States]," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(2), pages 435-445.
    3. Stefania Ilinca & Ricardo Rodrigues & Stefan Fors & Eszter Zólyomi & Janet Jull & Johan Rehnberg & Afshin Vafaei & Susan Phillips, 2022. "Gender differences in access to community-based care: a longitudinal analysis of widowhood and living arrangements," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1339-1350, December.
    4. Changyong Yang & Jianyuan Huang & Jiahao Yu, 2023. "Inequalities in Resource Distribution and Healthcare Service Utilization of Long-Term Care in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Javier Lera & Marta Pascual-Sáez & David Cantarero-Prieto, 2020. "Socioeconomic Inequality in the Use of Long-Term Care among European Older Adults: An Empirical Approach Using the SHARE Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Bo Hu & Javiera Cartagena-Farias & Nicola Brimblecombe, 2022. "Functional disability and utilisation of long-term care in the older population in England: a dual trajectory analysis," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1363-1373, December.
    7. Zhonghua Wang & Xue Yang & Mingsheng Chen, 2022. "Inequality and Associated Factors in Utilization of Long-Term Care Among Chinese Older People: Evidence from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 467-486, April.
    8. Carnazza, Giovanni & Liberati, Paolo & Resce, Giuliano, 2023. "Income-related unmet needs in the European countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    9. Marianne Tenand & Pieter Bakx & Eddy van Doorslaer, 2020. "Equal long‐term care for equal needs with universal and comprehensive coverage? An assessment using Dutch administrative data," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 435-451, April.
    10. Marianne Tenand & Pieter Bakx & Eddy van Doorslaer, 2020. "Eligibility or use? Disentangling the sources of horizontal inequity in home care receipt in the Netherlands," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(10), pages 1161-1179, October.
    11. Inés Calzada & Virginia Páez & Rafael Martínez-Cassinello & Andrea Hervás, 2023. "The Best Welfare Deal: Retirement Migrants as Welfare Maximizers," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Maria Gabriella Melchiorre & Sabrina Quattrini & Giovanni Lamura & Marco Socci, 2021. "A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Care Arrangements of Older People with Limited Physical Abilities Living Alone in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-35, December.
    13. Georgia Casanova & Mirian Fernández-Salido & Carolina Moreno-Castro, 2023. "The Risk of Household Socioeconomic Deprivation Related to Older Long-Term Care Needs: A Qualitative Exploratory Study in Italy and Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Bertin, Giovanni & Carrino, Ludovico & Pantalone, Marta, 2021. "Do standard classifications still represent European welfare typologies? Novel evidence from studies on health and social care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    15. Vidiella-Martin, Joaquim & Hernández-Pizarro, Helena M. & García-Gómez, Pilar & López-Casasnovas, Guillem, 2024. "Unravelling hidden inequities in a universal public long-term care system," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    16. Albuquerque, Paula C., 2022. "Met or unmet need for long-term care: Formal and informal care in southern Europe," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    17. Ricardo Rodrigues & Stefania Ilinca & Maša Filipovič Hrast & Andrej Srakar & Valentina Hlebec, 2022. "Care Task Division in Familialistic Care Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Gender and Socio-Economic Inequalities in Austria and Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Erwin Stolz & Hannes Mayerl & Éva Rásky & Wolfgang Freidl, 2019. "Individual and country-level determinants of nursing home admission in the last year of life in Europe," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-10, March.
    19. Maria Gabriella Melchiorre & Sabrina Quattrini & Giovanni Lamura & Marco Socci, 2022. "Role and Characteristics of Personal Care Assistants of Frail Older People with Functional Limitations Ageing in Place in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-25, March.
    20. Giuliano Resce & Raffaele Lagravinese & Elisa Benedetti & Sabrina Molinaro, 2019. "Income-related inequality in gambling: evidence from Italy," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1107-1131, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:1:p:121-132.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.