IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i3p716-727..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work-Family Conflict and Work Exit in Later Career Stage

Author

Listed:
  • Baowen Xue
  • Maria Fleischmann
  • Jenny Head
  • Anne McMunn
  • Mai Stafford
  • Deborah Carr

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study investigated relationships between work–family conflict and routes of later-life work exit.MethodsWe used a cohort of British civil servants (5,157 men; 2,027 women) who participated in the Whitehall II study. Work interference with family (WIF) and family interference with work (FIW) were measured up to three times over 10 years. Cause-specific Cox models were used to assess the influence of WIF/FIW on particular routes (“retirement,” “health-related exit,” “unemployment,” or “homemaker/other”) of work exit in later career stage and all routes combined.ResultsWIF was not associated with any route of work exit in men or women, after adjusting for confounders. For perceived higher FIW, men were less likely to exit work through retirement, homemaker/other, or all routes combined. This was not attenuated by adding family factors or working conditions. Women with higher FIW were more likely to exit through the homemaker route. This was no longer significant after adjusting for family factors. Neither FIW nor WIF was associated with health-related exit or unemployment.DiscussionFIW makes women more likely to become a homemaker at later career stage but reduces the risk of leaving work for men, which may reinforce gender inequality in work participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Baowen Xue & Maria Fleischmann & Jenny Head & Anne McMunn & Mai Stafford & Deborah Carr, 2020. "Work-Family Conflict and Work Exit in Later Career Stage," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(3), pages 716-727.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:3:p:716-727.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby146
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boyar, Scott L. & Maertz, Carl Jr. & Pearson, Allison W., 2005. "The effects of work-family conflict and family-work conflict on nonattendance behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(7), pages 919-925, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fau Naval, Lorenzo, 2022. "Poder de negociación intrafamiliar de las familias polacas [Intrahousehould bargaining power in polish families]," MPRA Paper 112540, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Mar 2022.
    2. Adame-Sánchez, Consolación & González-Cruz, Tomás F. & Martínez-Fuentes, Clara, 2016. "Do firms implement work–life balance policies to benefit their workers or themselves?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5519-5523.
    3. Rosario Vázquez-Carrasco & Ma. López-Pérez & Edgar Centeno, 2012. "A qualitative approach to the challenges for women in management: are they really starting in the 21st century?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1337-1357, August.
    4. Nimitha Aboobaker & Manoj Edward, 2020. "Collective Influence of Work–Family Conflict and Work–Family Enrichment on Turnover Intention: Exploring the Moderating Effects of Individual Differences," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(5), pages 1218-1231, October.
    5. Eddleston, Kimberly A. & Sieger, Philipp & Bernhard, Fabian, 2019. "From suffering firm to suffering family? How perceived firm performance relates to managers' work-to-family conflict," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 307-321.
    6. Jennifer E. Jennings & P. Devereaux Jennings & Manely Sharifian, 2016. "Living the Dream? Assessing the “Entrepreneurship as Emancipation†Perspective in a Developed Region," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(1), pages 81-110, January.
    7. Orly Shapira-Lishchinsky & Shmuel Even-Zohar, 2011. "Withdrawal Behaviors Syndrome: An Ethical Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 429-451, October.
    8. Aihua Tao & Qian Xu & Chencui Zhou & Wei Wang & Feng Yu, 2023. "Work Connectivity Behavior After-Hours and Turnover Intention: A Configuration Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:3:p:716-727.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.