IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v73y2018i6p1123-1132..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Long Arm of Maternal Differential Treatment: Effects of Recalled and Current Favoritism on Adult Children’s Psychological Well-Being

Author

Listed:
  • Siyun Peng
  • J Jill Suitor
  • Megan Gilligan

Abstract

Objectives In this article, we draw from classic theories of social psychology and the life course to compare the effects of current and recalled perceived maternal differential treatment (MDT) on the depressive symptoms of adult children in midlife.MethodTo address this question, we used data collected from 746 adult children nested within 293 later-life families as part of the Within-Family Differences Study.ResultsMultilevel regression revealed that both recollections of maternal differentiation from childhood and perceptions of mothers’ current disfavoritism regarding conflict predicted depressive symptoms, whereas perceptions of current favoritism regarding emotional closeness did not.DiscussionTaken together, the findings from this investigation reflect principles of theories of social comparison and the life course in that both perceptions of current MDT and MDT recalled from childhood affect children’s well-being in midlife. These findings contribute to a growing body of literature highlighting the role of within-family differences in parent–child relationships on well-being across the life course.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyun Peng & J Jill Suitor & Megan Gilligan, 2018. "The Long Arm of Maternal Differential Treatment: Effects of Recalled and Current Favoritism on Adult Children’s Psychological Well-Being," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(6), pages 1123-1132.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:6:p:1123-1132.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw105
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Jill Suitor & Megan Gilligan & Karl Pillemer, 2011. "Conceptualizing and Measuring Intergenerational Ambivalence in Later Life," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(6), pages 769-781.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. Chen & V. W. Q. Lou & C. Y. M. Cheng & T. Y. S. Lum & J. Y. M. Tang, 2022. "Family Caregiver’s Positive, Negative, and Ambivalent Feelings Towards Stroke Survivors: Association with Psychological Well-Being," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 169-183, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:6:p:1123-1132.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.