IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v66by2011i6p769-781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualizing and Measuring Intergenerational Ambivalence in Later Life

Author

Listed:
  • J. Jill Suitor
  • Megan Gilligan
  • Karl Pillemer

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Jill Suitor & Megan Gilligan & Karl Pillemer, 2011. "Conceptualizing and Measuring Intergenerational Ambivalence in Later Life," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(6), pages 769-781.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:66b:y:2011:i:6:p:769-781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbr108
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K. Chen & V. W. Q. Lou & C. Y. M. Cheng & T. Y. S. Lum & J. Y. M. Tang, 2022. "Family Caregiver’s Positive, Negative, and Ambivalent Feelings Towards Stroke Survivors: Association with Psychological Well-Being," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 169-183, February.
    2. Siyun Peng & J Jill Suitor & Megan Gilligan, 2018. "The Long Arm of Maternal Differential Treatment: Effects of Recalled and Current Favoritism on Adult Children’s Psychological Well-Being," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(6), pages 1123-1132.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:66b:y:2011:i:6:p:769-781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.