IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v73y2018i5pe39-e48..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Childhood Maltreatment and Psychological Well-Being in Later Life: The Mediating Effect of Contemporary Relationships with the Abusive Parent

Author

Listed:
  • Jooyoung Kong

Abstract

Objectives Parental childhood maltreatment has a negative impact on psychological well-being in adulthood. However, little is known about whether and how contemporary relationships with an abusive parent might explain the long-term harmful effects. Thus, this study aims to examine the mediating effect of later-life relationships with an abusive parent on the association between parental childhood maltreatment and psychological well-being. Methods Using the 2004–2005 Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, this study analyzed a total of 1,696 adults aged 65 years. A series of ordinary least squares regression and mediational analyses were performed. Results Key findings showed that maternal childhood neglect and abuse were associated with decreased emotional closeness with mothers, which was, in turn, associated with diminished psychological well-being. In addition, childhood neglect was associated with less frequent exchanges of social support with mothers, which was, in turn, associated with diminished psychological well-being. Discussion This study suggests that, despite childhood maltreatment, parent–child relationships persist throughout life, and the continuing relationship with an abusive parent may undermine adult victims’ psychological well-being. When intervening with mental health issues of adults who have experienced childhood maltreatment, their unresolved issues with the parent should be properly addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jooyoung Kong, 2018. "Childhood Maltreatment and Psychological Well-Being in Later Life: The Mediating Effect of Contemporary Relationships with the Abusive Parent," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(5), pages 39-48.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:5:p:e39-e48.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosemary Abbott & George Ploubidis & Felicia Huppert & Diana Kuh & Tim Croudace, 2010. "An Evaluation of the Precision of Measurement of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales in a Population Sample," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 357-373, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cederbaum, Julie A. & Palmer Molina, Abigail C. & Berry-Javier, Jessica N. & Schneiderman, Janet U. & Mennen, Ferol E., 2023. "Support in the transition to adulthood for individuals with child-welfare involvement histories," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Jiangang Shi & Wenwen Hua & Daizhong Tang & Fang Liu, 2022. "Sustainable Community Transformation and Community Integration of Agricultural Transfer Population—A Case Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manchiraju, Srikant, 2020. "Psychometric evaluation of the Ryff’s Scale of psychological wellbeing in self-identified American entrepreneurs," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    2. Hudig, J. & Scheepers, A.W.A. & Schippers, M.C. & Smeets, G., 2021. "A multidimensional approach to motives for studying explains differences in student wellbeing: Validation of the motivational mindset model," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2021-007-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    3. Saulo Sirigatti & Ilaria Penzo & Luca Iani & Annamaria Mazzeschi & Halina Hatalskaja & Enrichetta Giannetti & Cristina Stefanile, 2013. "Measurement Invariance of Ryff’s Psychological Well-being Scales Across Italian and Belarusian Students," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 67-80, August.
    4. Marié P. Wissing & Lusilda Schutte & Christelle Liversage & Brenda Entwisle & Marianne Gericke & Corey Keyes, 2021. "Important Goals, Meanings, and Relationships in Flourishing and Languishing States: Towards Patterns of Well-being," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(2), pages 573-609, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:5:p:e39-e48.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.