IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v73y2018i5p913-922..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in the Progression of Disability: A U.S.–Mexico Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Díaz-Venegas
  • Timothy A Reistetter
  • Rebeca Wong

Abstract

Objectives This article seeks to document the progression of disability in a developing country by implementing a model to examine how this process compares to a developed country. Methods Data come from the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), including a baseline survey in 2001 and a follow-up in 2003, and from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS), using the 2000 and 2002 waves. An ordinal logistic regression approach is used to examine a progression of disability that considers (a) no disability, (b) mobility problems, (c) mobility plus limitations with instrumental activities of daily living, (d) mobility plus limitations with activities of daily living (ADLs), (e) limitations in all three areas and (f) death. Results In both data sets, approximately 44% of the sample remained in the same level of disability at the 2-year follow-up. However, the progression of limitations with two disabilities differs by gender in the MHAS but is consistent for both men and women in the HRS. Discussion Our model reflects the importance of ADLs in the disablement process in Mexico. We speculate that the difference in lifetime risk profiles and cultural context might be responsible for the divergence in the progression of disability by gender.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Díaz-Venegas & Timothy A Reistetter & Rebeca Wong, 2018. "Differences in the Progression of Disability: A U.S.–Mexico Comparison," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(5), pages 913-922.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:5:p:913-922.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw082
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoyan Lei & Yuqing Hu & John J. McArdle & James P. Smith & Yaohui Zhao, 2012. "Gender Differences in Cognition among Older Adults in China," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 47(4), pages 951-971.
    2. Peek, M. Kristen & Ottenbacher, Kenneth J. & Markides, Kyriakos S. & Ostir, Glenn V., 2003. "Examining the disablement process among older Mexican American adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 413-425, August.
    3. repec:ran:wpaper:881 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. David Melzer & Grant Izmirlian & Suzanne G. Leveille & Jack M. Guralnik, 2001. "Educational Differences in the Prevalence of Mobility Disability in Old Age," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 56(5), pages 294-301.
    5. Kerstin Gerst-Emerson & Rebeca Wong & Alejandra Michaels-Obregon & Alberto Palloni, 2015. "Cross-National Differences in Disability Among Elders: Transitions in Disability in Mexico and the United States," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(5), pages 759-768.
    6. Mitra, Sophie & Posarac, Aleksandra & Vick, Brandon, 2011. "Disability and poverty in developing countries : a snapshot from the world health survey," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 62564, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elvira NICA & Gheorghe H. POPESCU, 2013. "Gender Differences In Strategy And Human Resource Management," Proceedings of Administration and Public Management International Conference, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 113-126, June.
    2. Islay Mactaggart & Lena Morgon Banks & Hannah Kuper & G V S Murthy & Jayanthi Sagar & Joseph Oye & Sarah Polack, 2018. "Livelihood opportunities amongst adults with and without disabilities in Cameroon and India: A case control study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Wong, Sandy, 2016. "Geographies of medicalized welfare: Spatial analysis of supplemental security income in the U.S., 2000–2010," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 9-19.
    4. Mitra, Sophie & Gao, Qin & Chen, Wei & Zhang, Yalu, 2020. "Health, work, and income among middle-aged and older adults: A panel analysis for China," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    5. Mont, Daniel & Nguyen, Cuong, 2013. "Does Parental Disability Matter to Child Education? Evidence from Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 88-107.
    6. Lisbet Grut & Lifah Sanudi & Stine Hellum Braathen & Thomas Jürgens & Arne H Eide, 2015. "Access to Tuberculosis Services for Individuals with Disability in Rural Malawi, a Qualitative Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-9, April.
    7. Mythily Subramaniam & Yen Sin Koh & P. V. AshaRani & Fiona Devi & Saleha Shafie & Peizhi Wang & Edimansyah Abdin & Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar & Chee Fang Sum & Eng Sing Lee & Siow Ann Chong, 2021. "The Prevalence and Correlates of Disability in Singapore: Results from a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Arlette Simo-Fotso, 2016. "Human Capital Accumulation of Disabled Children:Does Disability Really Matter?," Working Papers 222, Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED).
    9. Angrisani, Marco & Lee, Jinkook & Meijer, Erik, 2020. "The gender gap in education and late-life cognition: Evidence from multiple countries and birth cohorts," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    10. Lee, Jinkook & Smith, James P., 2014. "Regional disparities in adult height, educational attainment, and late-life cognition: Findings from the Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI)," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 26-34.
    11. Osea Giuntella & Wei Han & Fabrizio Mazzonna, 2017. "Circadian Rhythms, Sleep, and Cognitive Skills: Evidence From an Unsleeping Giant," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(5), pages 1715-1742, October.
    12. Shu, Lei, 2017. "Essays on retirement income provision," Other publications TiSEM e5dd8c4e-03bf-4ec9-9651-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Dobrescu, L.I. & Smith, J.P., 2016. "The HRS Around the World Surveys," Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, in: Piggott, John & Woodland, Alan (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 993-1018, Elsevier.
    14. LaFave, Daniel & Thomas, Duncan, 2017. "Height and cognition at work: Labor market productivity in a low income setting," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 52-64.
    15. Weir, David & Lay, Margaret & Langa, Kenneth, 2014. "Economic development and gender inequality in cognition: A comparison of China and India, and of SAGE and the HRS sister studies," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 114-125.
    16. Rafael Novella & Javier Olivera, 2014. "Mental Retirement and Non-Contributory Pensions for the Elderly Poor in Peru," Working Papers 14, Peruvian Economic Association.
    17. Belaynesh Tefera & Marloes L. van Engen & Alice Schippers & Arne H. Eide & Amber Kersten & Jac van der Klink, 2018. "Education, Work, and Motherhood in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Review of Equality Challenges and Opportunities for Women with Disabilities," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 82-93.
    18. Ruben Castro, 2012. "Educational differences in chronic conditions and their role in the educational differences in overall mortality," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 27(12), pages 339-364.
    19. Sha Sha & Sunny H. W. Chan & Lin Chen & Yuebin Xu & Yao Pan, 2022. "The Association between Trajectories of Loneliness and Physical Frailty in Chinese Older Adults: Does Age Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-12, April.
    20. repec:rom:campco:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:113-126 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Umapathi, Nithin & Wang, Dewen & O'Keefe, Philip, 2013. "Eligibility thresholds for minimum living guarantee programs : international practices and implications for China," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 83118, The World Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:5:p:913-922.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.