IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v73y2018i1p19-29..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intergenerational Transfer and Reporting Bias: An Application of the MIMIC Model

Author

Listed:
  • I-Fen Lin
  • Hsueh-Sheng Wu

Abstract

Objectives: Parents’ and adult children’s reports of transfer do not always agree, because each has respective bias. This study demonstrates a method to separate reporting bias from transfer and identify their respective correlates.MethodThe analysis was based on 4,947 parent-child dyads from the Family Roster and Transfer Module added to the 2013 wave of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Drawing on classical test theory, a multiple-indicators-and-multiple-causes (MIMIC) model was used to decompose parents’ and adult children’s reports of time and money transfers into a latent factor (true transfer) and unique factors (bias). This model further identified respective covariates associated with true transfer and bias. Results: A substantial amount of bias existed in parents’ and adult children’s reports. The self-enhancement hypothesis did not fully explain how resources to help and need for support relate to the direction of reporting bias. Some correlates of transfer identified in prior studies were associated with transfer only, some with bias only, and others with both transfer and bias. Discussion: Bias is common in both parents’ and adult children’s reports of transfer. Separating bias from transfer and identifying their respective correlates makes it possible to explain why intergenerational transfer and reporting bias occur.

Suggested Citation

  • I-Fen Lin & Hsueh-Sheng Wu, 2018. "Intergenerational Transfer and Reporting Bias: An Application of the MIMIC Model," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(1), pages 19-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:1:p:19-29.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx080
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liliana E. Pezzin & Robert A. Pollak & Barbara S. Schone, 2015. "Bargaining Power, Parental Caregiving, and Intergenerational Coresidence," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(6), pages 969-980.
    2. D. A. Grayson & A. Mackinnon & A. F. Jorm & H. Creasey & G. A. Broe, 2000. "Item Bias in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 55(5), pages 273-282.
    3. Kyungmin Kim & Steven H. Zarit & David J. Eggebeen & Kira S. Birditt & Karen L. Fingerman, 2011. "Discrepancies in Reports of Support Exchanges Between Aging Parents and Their Middle-Aged Children," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(5), pages 527-537.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adriana M. Reyes, 2022. "Race and Ethnic Differences in Financial Dependency of Coresident Young Adults During Economic Recessions and Over Time," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 51-65, March.
    2. Matthijs Kalmijn, 2019. "The Effects of Ageing on Intergenerational Support Exchange: A New Look at the Hypothesis of Flow Reversal," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 35(2), pages 263-284, May.
    3. Jeanne A. Teresi & Katja Ocepek-Welikson & John A. Toner & Marjorie Kleinman & Mildred Ramirez & Joseph P. Eimicke & Barry J. Gurland & Albert Siu, 2017. "Methodological Issues in Measuring Subjective Well-Being and Quality-of-Life: Applications to Assessment of Affect in Older, Chronically and Cognitively Impaired, Ethnically Diverse Groups Using the F," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(2), pages 251-288, June.
    4. Rainer W Alexandrowicz & Rebecca Jahn & Johannes Wancata, 2018. "Assessing the dimensionality of the CES-D using multi-dimensional multi-level Rasch models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Isabelle von Saenger & Lena Dahlberg & Erika Augustsson & Johan Fritzell & Carin Lennartsson, 2023. "Will your child take care of you in your old age? Unequal caregiving received by older parents from adult children in Sweden," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. GÁL, Róbert Iván & VANHUYSSE, Pieter & MEDGYESI, Márton, 2023. "Taxing Reproduction : The Invisible Transfer Cost of Rearing Children in Europe," CEI Working Paper Series 2023-04, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:1:p:19-29.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.