IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v72y2017i5p827-835..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Differences in Mobility Device Use Among U.S. Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Lindsay J Peterson
  • Hongdao Meng
  • Debra Dobbs
  • Kathryn Hyer

Abstract

ObjectivesResearch has shown greater mobility limitations among women than men. We aimed to examine (a) gender differences in the use of canes for mobility and (b) what factors contribute to these differences under the frameworks of the disablement model and the Theory of Planned Behavior.MethodUsing National Health and Aging Trends Study data, we estimated hierarchical logistic regression models to predict the likelihood of cane use among older adults who completed performance-based measures (n = 5,503). We tested the interactions between gender and selected variables to further understand gender difference.ResultsIn unadjusted analysis, 22% of women and 16% of men used canes. In models adjusted in steps for sociodemographics, health, physical impairments, capacity, psychosocial, and social environment factors, women were progressively less likely to use canes, significantly so at the last step. Suppression effect analyses showed the influence of living alone and receiving mobility help variables. Interaction analyses showed that women reporting poor health or balance were less likely to use canes; obese women were more likely.DiscussionSignificant gender differences exist in cane use among older community-living adults. Findings suggest that health and function partly account for these differences. Future research is needed to understand social/cultural factors involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindsay J Peterson & Hongdao Meng & Debra Dobbs & Kathryn Hyer, 2017. "Gender Differences in Mobility Device Use Among U.S. Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(5), pages 827-835.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:5:p:827-835.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw081
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I-Fen Lin & Hsueh-Sheng Wu, 2014. "Activity Limitations, Use of Assistive Devices or Personal Help, and Well-Being: Variation by Education," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 69(Suppl_1), pages 16-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:5:p:827-835.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.