IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v72y2017i1p16-24..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Better Cognition in New Birth Cohorts of 70 Year Olds, But Greater Decline Thereafter

Author

Listed:
  • Valgeir Thorvaldsson
  • Peter Karlsson
  • Johan Skoog
  • Ingmar Skoog
  • Boo Johansson

Abstract

Objectives:To evaluate birth cohort differences in level of cognition and rate of change in old age.Methods:Data were drawn from three population-based Swedish samples including age-homogenous cohorts born 1901/02, 1906/07, and 1930, and measured on the same cognitive tests at ages 70, 75, and 79 as part of the Gerontological and Geriatric Populations Studies in Gothenburg (H70). We fitted growth curve models to the data using a Bayesian framework and derived estimates and inferences from the marginal posterior distributions.Results:We found moderate to large birth cohort effects in level of performance on all cognitive outcomes. Later born cohorts, however, showed steeper linear rate of decline on reasoning, spatial ability, and perceptual- and motor-speed, but not on picture recognition memory and verbal ability.Discussion:These findings provide strong evidence for substantial birth cohort effects in cognition in older ages and emphasize the importance of life long environmental factors in shaping cognitive aging trajectories. Inferences from cognitive testing, and standardization of test scores, in elderly populations must take into account the substantial birth cohort differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Valgeir Thorvaldsson & Peter Karlsson & Johan Skoog & Ingmar Skoog & Boo Johansson, 2017. "Better Cognition in New Birth Cohorts of 70 Year Olds, But Greater Decline Thereafter," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(1), pages 16-24.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:1:p:16-24.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw125
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deborah Finkel & Chandra A. Reynolds & John J. McArdle & Nancy L. Pedersen, 2007. "Cohort Differences in Trajectories of Cognitive Aging," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 62(5), pages 286-294.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerstorf, Denis & Hülür, Gizem & Drewelies, Johanna & Eibich, Peter & Duezel, Sandra & Demuth, Ilja & Ghisletta, Paolo & Steinhagen-Thiessen, Elisabeth & Wagner, Gert G. & Lindenberger, Ulman, 2015. "Secular Changes in Late-Life Cognition and Well-Being: Towards a Long Bright Future with a Short Brisk Ending?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 30(2), pages 301-310.
    2. Oi, Katsuya, 2017. "Inter-connected trends in cognitive aging and depression: Evidence from the health and retirement study," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 56-65.
    3. Qi, Yaqiang & Xiong, Yajie, 2023. "Intercohort upsurge of cognitive ability among the general population in China: Evaluating a Flynn effect," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Overton, Marieclaire & Pihlsgård, Mats & Elmståhl, Sölve, 2018. "Up to speed: Birth cohort effects observed for speed of processing in older adults: Data from the Good Ageing in Skåne population study," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 33-43.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:1:p:16-24.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.