IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v70y2015i2p213-222..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aging, Empathy, and Prosociality

Author

Listed:
  • Janelle N. Beadle
  • Alexander H. Sheehan
  • Brian Dahlben
  • Angela H. Gutchess

Abstract

Objectives. Although empathy is a well-established motivation in younger adults for helping others, it is not known whether this extends to aging. Prioritization of socioemotional goals with age may increase the salience of helping others (i.e., prosocial behavior), but older adults also experience decreased cognitive empathy. Thus, we investigated age-related differences in relationships among empathy and prosocial behavior. Method. Participants were 24 younger (M = 19.8 years) and 24 older (M = 77.9 years) healthy adults. Whereas participants believed the study involved playing the dictator game, in reality, state emotional empathy was induced implicitly through a note from an opponent describing their experience with cancer. Prosocial behavior was measured by participants’ monetary offers to that opponent. Results. Older adults showed greater prosocial behavior due to the empathy induction than younger adults. There was a positive association between state emotional empathy ratings and prosocial behavior in older, but not in younger adults, and preliminary evidence for higher state emotional empathy levels in older adults with higher trait cognitive empathy. Discussion. This suggests that in contexts relevant to socioemotional goals, older adults may be more motivated than younger adults to help others and state emotional empathy may be a potential mechanism for greater prosocial behavior in aging.

Suggested Citation

  • Janelle N. Beadle & Alexander H. Sheehan & Brian Dahlben & Angela H. Gutchess, 2015. "Aging, Empathy, and Prosociality," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(2), pages 213-222.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:70:y:2015:i:2:p:213-222.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbt091
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David R. Roalf & Suzanne H. Mitchell & William T. Harbaugh & Jeri S. Janowsky, 2012. "Risk, Reward, and Economic Decision Making in Aging," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 67(3), pages 289-298.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Sommerlad & Jonathan Huntley & Gill Livingston & Katherine P Rankin & Daisy Fancourt, 2021. "Empathy and its associations with age and sociodemographic characteristics in a large UK population sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Molly A. Mather & Rebecca E. Ready, 2021. "Greater negative affect and mixed emotions during spontaneous reactions to sad films in older than younger adults," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 29-43, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:1:p:112-134 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kettner, Sara Elisa & Waichman, Israel, 2016. "Old age and prosocial behavior: Social preferences or experimental confounds?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 118-130.
    3. Lutz Sommer, 2019. "The Influence of International Experience on Bargaining Behavior," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 23(1), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Lorenzo Lotti & Shanali Pethiyagoda, 2022. "Generosity during COVID-19: investigating socioeconomic shocks and game framing," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Yiyun Shou & Joel Olney, 2020. "Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scale," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(1), pages 112-134, January.
    6. Keane, M.P. & Thorp, S., 2016. "Complex Decision Making," Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, in: Piggott, John & Woodland, Alan (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 661-709, Elsevier.
    7. Matthias Rieger & Rui Mata, 2015. "On the Generality of Age Differences in Social and Nonsocial Decision Making," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(2), pages 200-212.
    8. Kawamura, Tetsuya & Ogawa, Kazuhito, 2019. "Cognitive ability and human behavior in experimental ultimatum games," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 97-106.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:70:y:2015:i:2:p:213-222.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.