IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v68y2013i4p593-598.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential Effects of Perceptions of Mothers’ and Fathers’ Favoritism on Sibling Tension in Adulthood

Author

Listed:
  • Megan Gilligan
  • J. Jill Suitor
  • Seoyoun Kim
  • Karl Pillemer

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Megan Gilligan & J. Jill Suitor & Seoyoun Kim & Karl Pillemer, 2013. "Differential Effects of Perceptions of Mothers’ and Fathers’ Favoritism on Sibling Tension in Adulthood," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 68(4), pages 593-598.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:68:y:2013:i:4:p:593-598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbt039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhao, Yunyan & Chen, Fumei & Yuan, Chunyong & Luo, Rui & Ma, Xinyu & Zhang, Cai, 2021. "Parental favoritism and mobile phone addiction in Chinese adolescents: The role of sibling relationship and gender difference," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Chen Lin & Yuxin Chen & Jeongwen Chiang & Yufei Zhang, 2021. "Do “Little Emperors” Get More Than “Little Empresses”? Boy-Girl Gender Discrimination as Evidenced by Consumption Behavior of Chinese Households," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(6), pages 1123-1146, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:68:y:2013:i:4:p:593-598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.