IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v64by2009i5p577-585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ACTIVE Cognitive Training Interventions and the Onset of and Recovery from Suspected Clinical Depression

Author

Listed:
  • Fredric D. Wolinsky
  • Henry W. Mahncke
  • Mark W. Vander Weg
  • Rene Martin
  • Frederick W. Unverzagt
  • Karlene K. Ball
  • Richard N. Jones
  • Sharon L. Tennstedt

Abstract

We evaluated the effects of the 3 cognitive interventions fielded in the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly study on 2 subsets of participants--1,606 without and 424 with suspected clinical depression at baseline. In the former group, only the speed of processing (vs. no-contact control) intervention had a significant effect, with its participants being 38% less likely to develop suspected clinical depression at 1 year (adjusted odds ratio = 0.62; p < .01). None of the interventions had a significant effect on recovery from suspected clinical depression in the latter group. Although the etiological mechanism of the speed of processing's protective effect was not isolated, it may result from successful adaptation to age-related changes through selective optimization with compensation. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Fredric D. Wolinsky & Henry W. Mahncke & Mark W. Vander Weg & Rene Martin & Frederick W. Unverzagt & Karlene K. Ball & Richard N. Jones & Sharon L. Tennstedt, 2009. "The ACTIVE Cognitive Training Interventions and the Onset of and Recovery from Suspected Clinical Depression," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(5), pages 577-585.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:5:p:577-585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbp061
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catherine Borness & Judith Proudfoot & John Crawford & Michael Valenzuela, 2013. "Putting Brain Training to the Test in the Workplace: A Randomized, Blinded, Multisite, Active-Controlled Trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-8, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:5:p:577-585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.