IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v41y2014i4p657-680..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the political economy of allocation of agricultural disaster relief payments: application to Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Hung-Hao Chang
  • David Zilberman

Abstract

This paper examines the importance of political factors in the allocation of agricultural disaster payments as a result of Typhoon Morakot that ravaged Taiwan in 2009. The instrumental variable model was estimated using a unique data set that combines a national administrative profile of the 607,704 recipients of disaster relief payments and the matched weather and geographic information. Results show that the political factor significantly determined the level of disaster relief payments. The incumbent government paid more to the farms located in towns which voted for the incumbent party to a greater extent than they did for the opposition party.

Suggested Citation

  • Hung-Hao Chang & David Zilberman, 2014. "On the political economy of allocation of agricultural disaster relief payments: application to Taiwan," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 41(4), pages 657-680.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:41:y:2014:i:4:p:657-680.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbt037
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tatyana Deryugina & Barrett Kirwan, 2018. "Does The Samaritan'S Dilemma Matter? Evidence From U.S. Agriculture," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(2), pages 983-1006, April.
    2. Hong, Yan-Zhen & Chang, Hung-Hao, 2020. "Does digitalization affect the objective and subjective wellbeing of forestry farm households? Empirical evidence in Fujian Province of China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Jaerim Choi & Sunghun Lim, 2023. "Tariffs, agricultural subsidies, and the 2020 US presidential election," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1149-1175, August.
    4. Meri Davlasheridze & Qing Miao, 2021. "Natural disasters, public housing, and the role of disaster aid," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1113-1135, November.
    5. Meyerhoefer, Chad D. & Chang, Hung-Hao, 2021. "Health Care Expenditure and Farm Household Income: Evidence from Natural Disasters," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313907, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Fabio G. Santeramo & A. Ford Ramsey, 2017. "Crop Insurance in the EU: Lessons and Caution from the US," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 16(3), pages 34-39, December.
    7. F. G. Santeramo & B. K. Goodwin & F. Adinolfi & F. Capitanio, 2016. "Farmer Participation, Entry and Exit Decisions in the Italian Crop Insurance Programme," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 639-657, September.
    8. Ramsey, Austin Ford & Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano, 2017. "Crop Insurance in the European Union: Lessons and Caution from the United States," MPRA Paper 79164, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:41:y:2014:i:4:p:657-680.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.