IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v20y1993i1p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Welfare Implications of Oligopoly in Agricultural Input Markets

Author

Listed:
  • McCorriston, Steve

Abstract

The persistence of oligopoly in the agricultural input supply sector suggests that farmers' economic welfare is reduced since the price of agricultural inputs will be in excess of marginal cost. This paper focuses on the U.K. fertilizer and tractor industries and measures the welfare impact on U.K. farmers if oligopoly in these two industries could be removed. Using a computable partial equilibrium model, it is shown that depending on the definition of welfare loss, farmers' producer surplus could increase by as much as 30 percent with most of this being due to eradicating oligopoly in the fertilizer industry. These results suggest that the social costs of market power in these industries could be higher than those found for manufacturing industries in general. Copyright 1993 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • McCorriston, Steve, 1993. "The Welfare Implications of Oligopoly in Agricultural Input Markets," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:20:y:1993:i:1:p:1-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Friedrich Schneider & Klaus Salhofer & Erwin Schmid & Gerhard Streicher, 2001. "Was the Austrian agricultural policy least cost efficient?," Economics working papers 2001-03, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    2. A L Tiffin & P J Dawson, 1997. "Measuring Oligopolistic Distortion In The Uk Frozen Potato Product Sector: A Calibration Modelling Approach," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1‐3), pages 300-312, January.
    3. Salhofer, Klaus & Schneider, Friedrich & Streicher, Gerhard, 1999. "Least Cost Efficiency Of Agricultural Programs: An Empirical Investigation," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21565, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. C. R. Dryburgh & C. J. Doyle, 1995. "Distribution Of Research Gains Under Different Market Structures: The Impact Of Technological Change Within The Uk Dairy Industry," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 80-96, January.
    5. Nolan, Elizabeth & Santos, Paulo, 2009. "Evidence for increasing concentration in plant breeding industries in the United States and the European Union," 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia 48060, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Ronchi, Loraine, 2006. "Fairtrade and market failures in agricultural commodity markets," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4011, The World Bank.
    7. Oskam, Arie J. & Meester, Gerrit, 2006. "How useful is the PSE in determining agricultural support?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 123-141, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:20:y:1993:i:1:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.