IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ecpoli/v28y2013i73p143-187..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple faces of preferential market access: their causes and consequences
[Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle]

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Egger
  • Georg Wamser

Abstract

This paper suggests an integrated approach to study selection into and consequences of five modes of preferential economic integration agreements (PEIAs): goods trade agreements (GTAs), services trade agreements (STAs), double taxation treaties (DTTs), bilateral investment treaties (BITs), and currency unions as well as currency pegs (CUAs). A detailed descriptive analysis reveals typical integration patterns, with DTTs and BITs often being first steps towards deeper integration. We consider the effects of PEIAs on bilateral goods trade, services trade, and FDI and provide conclusive evidence that single and combined PEIAs are associated with positive effects not only on single outcome but typically on all outcomes. Investment liberalization through DTTs and BITs seems to be particularly beneficial since concluding them alone or in any combination with other agreements encourages goods trade even more than the liberalization of goods trade per se— Peter Egger and Georg Wamser

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Egger & Georg Wamser, 2013. "Multiple faces of preferential market access: their causes and consequences [Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 28(73), pages 143-187.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:28:y:2013:i:73:p:143-187.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1468-0327.12003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shadat Hossain, 2018. "SAFTA and AFTA: a comparative welfare analysis of two regional trade agreements," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Peter Egger & Valeria Merlo & Georg Wamser, 2017. "Cross-country Services Versus Manufacturing Activity of Multinational Firms in Response to Services Versus Goods Policy," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 490-498, March.
    3. Egger Peter & Wamser Georg, 2013. "Effects of the Endogenous Scope of Preferentialism on International Goods Trade," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 709-731, July.
    4. Xing Yao & Yongzhong Zhang & Rizwana Yasmeen & Zhen Cai, 2021. "The impact of preferential trade agreements on bilateral trade: A structural gravity model analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Peter Egger & Martin Gassebner, 2015. "International terrorism as a trade impediment?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 67(1), pages 42-62.
    6. Peter Egger & Doina Radulescu & Nora Strecker, 2017. "On the spread of social protection systems," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 24(4), pages 550-574, August.
    7. Peter Egger & Alain Pirotte & Catharine Titi, 2023. "International investment agreements and foreign direct investment: A survey," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 1524-1565, June.
    8. Aurélie Slechten & Vincenzo Verardi, 2016. "Measuring the Impact of Multiple Air Pollution Agreements on Global CO2 Emissions," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 92(3), pages 534-554.
    9. Peter Egger & Michael Stimmelmayr, 2017. "Taxation and the Multinational Firm," CESifo Working Paper Series 6384, CESifo.
    10. Monika Sztajerowska, 2021. "International Investment Agreements, Double-Taxation Treaties and Multinational Activity: The (Heterogeneous) Effects of Binding," PSE Working Papers halshs-03265057, HAL.
    11. Monika Sztajerowska, 2021. "International Investment Agreements, Double-Taxation Treaties and Multinational Activity: The (Heterogeneous) Effects of Binding," Working Papers halshs-03265057, HAL.
    12. Harendt, Christoph & Dreßler, Daniel & Overesch, Michael, 2016. "The Impact of Tax Treaties and Repatriation Taxes on FDI Revisited," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145588, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    13. Fan, Zhaobin & Zhou, Ying & Anwar, Sajid, 2024. "Centralization of trade agreements network and global value chain participation," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 11-24.
    14. Badi H. Baltagi & Peter H. Egger & Michaela Kesina, 2016. "Bayesian Spatial Bivariate Panel Probit Estimation," Advances in Econometrics, in: Spatial Econometrics: Qualitative and Limited Dependent Variables, volume 37, pages 119-144, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    15. Sebastian Benz & Dorothée Rouzet & Francesca Spinelli, 2020. "Firm heterogeneity in services trade: Micro‐level evidence from eight OECD countries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(11), pages 2905-2931, November.
    16. Sébastien Jean & Jean-Christophe Bureau, 2015. "Do Regional Trade Agreements Really Boost Trade? Estimates for Agricultural Products," Working Papers 2015-09, CEPII research center.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:28:y:2013:i:73:p:143-187.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cebruuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.