IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ecpoli/v20y2005i41p112-157..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Television in a digital age: what role for public service broadcasting?
[‘Market provision of broadcasting: A welfare analysis’, mimeo]

Author

Listed:
  • Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap
  • Paul Seabright

Abstract

Summary Public service broadcastingThe television broadcasting industry is subject to an exceptionally high level of public intervention, but one of the reasons for this, the absence of competition, is fast disappearing as households become multi-channel. This paper is concerned with whether a case for public service broadcasting remains and, if so, what form it should take. There are several other potential sources of market failure, but a lack of evidence often makes judging their practical significance difficult. To help overcome this problem and provide the basis for improved public accountability, the paper proposes several measures of public service broadcasting performance. The paper also considers when the appropriate remedy for these failures might take the form of dedicated public service broadcasters like the BBC, RAI, ARD, France 2, etc. It suggests that, in general, targeted supply side interventions of this sort only make sense when they address a supply side failure and that dedicated public service broadcasters are to be preferred to alternative types of targeted intervention, like an ‘Arts Council of the Air’, on contractual grounds.— Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap

Suggested Citation

  • Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap & Paul Seabright, 2005. "Television in a digital age: what role for public service broadcasting? [‘Market provision of broadcasting: A welfare analysis’, mimeo]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 20(41), pages 112-157.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:20:y:2005:i:41:p:112-157.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2005.00134.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruben Durante & Paolo Pinotti & Andrea Tesei, 2019. "The Political Legacy of Entertainment TV," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(7), pages 2497-2530, July.
    2. Andreas Hadamitzky & Korbinian Von Blanckenburg & Christof Backhaus, 2007. "Die Bereitstellung von öffentlich‐rechtlichen Fernseh‐ und Rundfunkprogrammen: Eine Analyse auf Basis der Kollektivgütertheorie," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 8(3), pages 256-278, August.
    3. Beck Hanno & Beyer Andrea, 2013. "Öffentlich-Rechtlicher Rundfunk in der Krise: Reformbedarf und Reformoptionen / Public broadcasting in crisis," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 64(1), pages 221-252, January.
    4. Nadine Lindstädt, 2010. "Germany’s PSB going online – is there an economic justification for Public Service Media online?," Working Papers 102/10, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Sociology, Environmental and Business Economics.
    5. Rothbauer, Julia & Sieg, Gernot, 2011. "Welfare effects of public service broadcasting in a free-to-air TV market," Economics Department Working Paper Series 13, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Economics Department.
    6. Christine Benesch, 2010. "Governance of Public Broadcasters and Television Consumption," CREMA Working Paper Series 2010-18, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    7. Strömberg, David & Prat, Andrea, 2011. "The Political Economy of Mass Media," CEPR Discussion Papers 8246, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:20:y:2005:i:41:p:112-157.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cebruuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.