IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v134y2024i662p2530-2557..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accommodating the Rise in Urbanisation: Are New Towns a Good Solution?

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Loumeau

Abstract

This paper studies the performance of New Towns, that is, planned large urban sub-centres, as a central tool to accommodate the global rise in urbanisation. A spatial quantifiable general equilibrium framework suitable to study large-scale urban master plans is presented. The framework is then used to investigate the equilibrium effects of five New Towns developed in the 1970s in Paris’s metropolitan area. By 2015, the development of New Towns appears to have increased metropolitan population (18%), metropolitan gross domestic product (11%) and reduced average commuting times (−6.9%). The results obtained for Paris’s metropolitan area are externally validated using a difference-in-differences approach on all 314 New Towns developed worldwide between 1992 and 2012.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Loumeau, 2024. "Accommodating the Rise in Urbanisation: Are New Towns a Good Solution?," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(662), pages 2530-2557.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:134:y:2024:i:662:p:2530-2557.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueae031
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephen J. Redding, 2024. "Quantitative Urban Economics," Working Papers 340, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:134:y:2024:i:662:p:2530-2557.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.