IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v129y2019i620p1817-1862..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonprofit Tax Exemptions, For-profit Competition and Spillovers to Community Services

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa D Harrison
  • Katja Seim

Abstract

We investigate the importance of nonprofit tax exemptions to the structure of local fitness markets and to the nonprofit's decision to complement fitness offerings with youth programming. We estimate an equilibrium model of market structure of nonprofit and for-fitness centres. Our results suggest that the two ownership types serve different customer bases. We predict that a revocation of tax exemptions would lower nonprofit entry by 26%, leaving for-profit entry unaffected. This decline in nonprofit entry derives primarily from fitness facilities that jointly operate a youth programme. Tax exemptions thus aid in both the provision of the primary and auxiliary services.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa D Harrison & Katja Seim, 2019. "Nonprofit Tax Exemptions, For-profit Competition and Spillovers to Community Services," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(620), pages 1817-1862.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:129:y:2019:i:620:p:1817-1862.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ecoj.12615
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iris Grant & Iris Kesternich & Johannes Van Biesebroeck, 2022. "Entry Decisions And Asymmetric Competition Between Non‐Profit And For‐Profit Homes In The Long‐Term Care Market," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(2), pages 631-670, May.
    2. Gayle, Philip & Harrison, Teresa, 2023. "Competition and Strategic Responses to Fundraising in Donative Markets," School of Economics Working Paper Series 2024-9, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University, revised 01 Aug 2024.
    3. Chevalier, Judith A. & Schwartz, Jason L. & Su, Yihua & Williams, Kevin R., 2022. "JUE Insight: Distributional Impacts of Retail Vaccine Availability," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:129:y:2019:i:620:p:1817-1862.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.