IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v11y2018i3p443-457..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Growing care gaps, shrinking state? Home care workers and the Fair Labor Standards Act

Author

Listed:
  • Kim England
  • Caitlin Alcorn

Abstract

Home care work will be among the fastest growing jobs in the USA in the next 10 years, linked to the increase in people aged over 65. Located at the intersection of health care, social policy and the state, home care work is notable for its low pay, job insecurity and irregular hours. The legal and economic precarity of home care workers has roots in the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). We analyse the FLSA and subsequent amendments regarding home care workers, as a vehicle for exploring American state intervention into and apparent retreat from the social safety net and promoting collective well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim England & Caitlin Alcorn, 2018. "Growing care gaps, shrinking state? Home care workers and the Fair Labor Standards Act," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(3), pages 443-457.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:11:y:2018:i:3:p:443-457.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rsy027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emily Reid-Musson & Ellen MacEachen & Mary Beckie & Lars Hallström, 2022. "Work without workers: legal geographies of family farm exclusions from labour laws in Alberta, Canada," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 1027-1038, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:11:y:2018:i:3:p:443-457.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.