IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v48y2024i6p1119-1165..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conspicuous consumption for social parity

Author

Listed:
  • Chinmayi Srikanth
  • Shubhasis Dey

Abstract

Extant literature on status signalling primarily adopts Veblen’s theory of class to caste and racial identities. This study aimed at adopting a more suitable theoretical lens to examine status signalling that is more relevant not only for class identities, but also for other identities such as caste and racial identities. By viewing conspicuous consumption within the framework of the stigma-identity-threat model, the study analyses how socially disadvantaged groups in India respond to stigma through their consumption behaviour. Using data from two rounds of the India Human Development Survey, we study whether disadvantaged social groups embrace or distance themselves from their stigmatised identity. For the periods 2004–05 and 2011–12, we find that households from scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and other backward classes among caste groups, and Muslims among religious groups, tend to move away from their devalued identity. However, the manner in which this is done not only varies across these social groups but also across time. The study also finds that the material threshold that a social group needs to surpass in order to stop signalling status varies based on their position in the social hierarchy.

Suggested Citation

  • Chinmayi Srikanth & Shubhasis Dey, 2024. "Conspicuous consumption for social parity," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 48(6), pages 1119-1165.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:48:y:2024:i:6:p:1119-1165.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beae031
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:48:y:2024:i:6:p:1119-1165.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.