IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v48y2024i4p767-784..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does self-employment provide a bridge to retirement?
[Contract work at older ages]

Author

Listed:
  • Brigitte Hoogendoorn
  • Martha O’Hagan-Luff
  • Sanaz Ramezani
  • André van Stel

Abstract

Non-employment including early retirement among individuals of older working age is a considerable concern. As life expectancies across the developed world continue to increase, individuals’ retirement savings often turn out to be inadequate. In policy circles, given the increasing old-age dependency ratio, self-employment is often seen as a potential route to extend the working lives of older labour force participants. By studying labour market switches of wage workers of 50 years and older, we investigate to what extent self-employment serves as a bridge to retirement. Using a longitudinal data base in European countries over the period 2005–2015, our findings suggest that although self-employment does serve as a bridge to retirement, this is much less likely to be the case for precarious wage workers—especially those with poor job prospects—than for wage workers at the higher end of the labour market, including those who are in good health and who have good job prospects in their current wage job. We also find that wage workers with precarious job conditions are more likely to switch into non-employment rather than into self-employment. Policy implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Brigitte Hoogendoorn & Martha O’Hagan-Luff & Sanaz Ramezani & André van Stel, 2024. "Does self-employment provide a bridge to retirement? [Contract work at older ages]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 48(4), pages 767-784.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:48:y:2024:i:4:p:767-784.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beae016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:48:y:2024:i:4:p:767-784.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.