IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v48y2024i1p41-68..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing working hours: shorter days or fewer days per week? Insights from a 30-hour workweek experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Francisca Mullens
  • Ignace Glorieux

Abstract

Recently, more and more experiments with a reduction in working time are taking place. Most experiments and introductions of shorter workweeks do not leave the choice of the type/form of reduction up to employees, but to employers. An experiment with a 30-hour workweek in a women’s organisation in Belgium was rather unique in the sense that employees were free to choose how to reduce their working hours on a weekly basis. Based on longitudinal survey and time-diary data as well as in-depth interviews and focus groups, this article investigates what form of working time reduction was preferred by the female employees and what factors influenced these preferences. The life course perspective is taken as a lens through which we analyse women’s preferences and choices. Results show that there was a clear preference for having one day off per week instead of shorter daily hours. This choice was mostly related to meso-factors concerning work and private circumstances and is not fixed but rather dynamic.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisca Mullens & Ignace Glorieux, 2024. "Reducing working hours: shorter days or fewer days per week? Insights from a 30-hour workweek experiment," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 48(1), pages 41-68.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:48:y:2024:i:1:p:41-68.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bead049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:48:y:2024:i:1:p:41-68.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.