IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v46y2022i2p341-370..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information rents, economic growth and inequality: an empirical study of the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Tomas N Rotta

Abstract

In this paper, I estimate the impact of unproductive activities on economic growth, labour productivity and income inequality in the United States from 1947 to 2011. Productive activities directly create value, while unproductive activities do not. I develop a new methodology to compute the growth of productive and unproductive activities in terms of flows of income and stocks of fixed assets using input-output matrices and national income accounts. A core feature of my methodology is the notion that the commodification of knowledge and information gives rise to ‘information rents’. Information rents are, as I demonstrate, a determinant factor of growth and distribution. I find that unproductive activities have a net positive effect on economic growth and labour productivity, but at the price of increasing income inequality. Unproductive activities that rely on information rents, in particular, have increased income inequality and slowed down value-added growth despite their positive contribution to labour productivity. Information rents have drawn too much value from productive activities and benefitted the top income earners.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomas N Rotta, 2022. "Information rents, economic growth and inequality: an empirical study of the United States," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(2), pages 341-370.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:46:y:2022:i:2:p:341-370.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beac004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhongjin Li & Hao Qi, 2023. "The Profitability Puzzle of Digital Labor Platforms," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 617-628, December.
    2. Jakob Kapeller & Claudius Gräbner-Radkowitsch & Anna Hornykewycz, 2024. "Corporate power and global value chains: current approaches for conceptualizing the power of multinationals," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 371-397, September.
    3. Rotta, Tomás N. & Kumar, Rishabh, 2024. "Was Marx right? Development and exploitation in 43 countries, 2000–2014," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 213-223.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:46:y:2022:i:2:p:341-370.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.