IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v42y2018i2p477-504..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond capital fundamentalism: Harrod, Domar and the history of development economics
[Economics of growth]

Author

Listed:
  • Mauro Boianovsky

Abstract

The origins of ‘capital fundamentalism’—the notion that physical capital accumulation is the primary determinant of economic growth—have been often ascribed to Harrod’s and Domar’s proposition that the rate of growth is the product of the saving rate and of the output-capital ratio. However, neither Harrod nor Domar fit in the ‘capital fundamentalism’ idea. Development planners in the 1950s adapted the growth formula to their own agenda. Most development economists at the time were aware that Harrod’s and Domar’s growth models addressed economic instability issues, not long-run growth. Harrod eventually applied his concept of the natural growth rate to economic development. He claimed that the growth of developing economies was determined by their ability to implement technical progress. Domar observed that the incremental capital-output ratio was more likely a passive result of the interaction between the propensity to save and technological progress, not a causal factor.

Suggested Citation

  • Mauro Boianovsky, 2018. "Beyond capital fundamentalism: Harrod, Domar and the history of development economics [Economics of growth]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 42(2), pages 477-504.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:42:y:2018:i:2:p:477-504.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bex030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kawalec Paweł, 2020. "The dynamics of theories of economic growth: An impact of Unified Growth Theory," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 19-44, June.
    2. Wang, Yanjun & Li, Yongfang, 2023. "Chinese economic growth and sustainable development: Role of artificial intelligence and natural resource management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    3. Michael Takudzwa Pasara & Rufaro Garidzirai, 2020. "Causality Effects among Gross Capital Formation, Unemployment and Economic Growth in South Africa," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Mauro BoianovskyBy, 2017. "Optimum saving and growth: Harrod on dynamic welfare economics," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 69(4), pages 1120-1137.
    5. Sardoni, Claudio, 2024. "Public spending and growth: A simple model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 56-62.
    6. Ricardo Azevedo Araujo & Carlos Eduardo Drumond, 2021. "A two‐sector neo‐Kaleckian model of growth and distribution: Investment allocation and evolutionary dynamics," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 213-236, February.
    7. Diana Barros (a) Aurora A.C. Teixeira (b), 2021. "A Portrait of Development Economics in the Last Sixty Years," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 69-118, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Capital fundamentalism; Harrod; Domar; Development economics; Saving;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B22 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Macroeconomics
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:42:y:2018:i:2:p:477-504.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.