IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v40y2016i1p283-308..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Philosophy and psychology of mathematics according to Alfred Marshall

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Dardi

Abstract

Marshall’s recipe for mathematical economics can be described as generous doses of the imagery (‘language’) of mathematics combined with as little space as possible for its demonstrative methods (‘reasonings’). In other words, use the semantics of mathematics, but be wary of its syntax. The article traces the origins of this recipe in the broadly defined ‘intuitionist’ philosophy of mathematics which marked the reformed Cambridge Mathematical Tripos during the mid-nineteenth century. Marshall’s early philosophical papers reveal that he meditated and reconstructed this philosophy in terms of his own. His later approach to mathematical economics can be accounted for as an adaptation of this intuitionist background to the needs of economic theory as he perceived them.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Dardi, 2016. "Philosophy and psychology of mathematics according to Alfred Marshall," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 40(1), pages 283-308.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:40:y:2016:i:1:p:283-308.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beu078
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vlassis Missos, 2020. "Mathematical Analysis as a Source of Mainstream Economic Ideology," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 9(1), pages 72-95, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:40:y:2016:i:1:p:283-308.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.