IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v39y2015i2p421-440..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Australia’s gender pay equity legislation: how new, how different, what prospects?

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Charlesworth
  • Fiona Macdonald

Abstract

Australia’s equal pay laws have recently been renovated through the Workplace Gender Equality Act 2012 and the Fair Work Act 2009. In light of these changes, it is timely to ask how effective Australia’s legislative approach is likely to be for progressing pay equity. This article presents an analysis of Australia’s current equal pay provisions, assessing their potential on the basis of their operation to date and through recent experience in Canada and the UK. Although focused on outcomes, we argue that Australia’s new workplace-based mechanism under the Workplace Gender Equality Act may prove relatively ineffective in both diagnosing and remedying pay inequality. In comparative perspective the Fair Work Act provisions provide significant capacity to improve pay equity across large sectors of the labour market. To date the use of these provisions point to some practical limitations in realising this potential. Moreover, the inadequate legislative and policy integration between labour market, sectoral, workplace and individual approaches together with a wavering political commitment to equality legislation generally suggest gender pay inequity will remain a persistent feature of Australian employment.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Charlesworth & Fiona Macdonald, 2015. "Australia’s gender pay equity legislation: how new, how different, what prospects?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 39(2), pages 421-440.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:39:y:2015:i:2:p:421-440.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beu044
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marion Hutchinson & Janet Mack & Peter Verhoeven & Tom Smith, 2017. "Women in leadership: an analysis of the gender pay gap in ASX-listed firms," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(3), pages 789-813, September.
    2. Julien Picault, 2023. "A strategic approach to managerial compliance with equal pay policies," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Chris Nyland & Beibei Pan & Brian Cooper & Berenice Nyland & Xiaodong Zeng, 2016. "Parent employment and preschool utilisation in urban China," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5-6), pages 454-472, November.
    4. Kamal, Mustafa & Blacklow, Paul, 2021. "Australian age, period, cohort effects in the gender wage gap - 2001 to 2018," Working Papers 2021-02, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:39:y:2015:i:2:p:421-440.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.