IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v37y2013i5p1035-1055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Funds, poverty management and subjectification: beyond the World Bank approach

Author

Listed:
  • Anjan Chakrabarti
  • Anup Dhar

Abstract

Revisiting, from a Marxist perspective, the World Bank's discourse on Social Funds, we highlight three findings. One, Social Funds gets deployed in the context of a larger Third Worldist discourse of poverty management, which in turn helps deepen the logic of capitalist development. Two, generating a class-focused understanding of Social Funds (via the concept of social surplus), we argue that class processes and need processes constitute one another and through this conduit emerges a relation between global capital and the poverty alleviation programme of Social Funds. Lastly, interrogating the management approach underlying Social Funds leads us to question claims of decentralisation and participation. Our analysis exposes an underlying process of subjectification by way of a control mechanism exercised through the code of conduct encapsulated in that managerial approach. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Anjan Chakrabarti & Anup Dhar, 2013. "Social Funds, poverty management and subjectification: beyond the World Bank approach," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(5), pages 1035-1055.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:37:y:2013:i:5:p:1035-1055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bes077
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Soumik Sarkar & Anjan Chakrabarti, 2022. "Rethinking the Formation of Public Distribution System: A Class-Focused Approach," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 26-43, March.
    2. Yi Cai & Chunping Xia, 2018. "Interpretive Structural Analysis of Interrelationships among the Elements of Characteristic Agriculture Development in Chinese Rural Poverty Alleviation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Konstantinos Papageorgiou & Pramod K. Singh & Elpiniki Papageorgiou & Harpalsinh Chudasama & Dionysis Bochtis & George Stamoulis, 2019. "Fuzzy Cognitive Map-Based Sustainable Socio-Economic Development Planning for Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, December.
    4. Pramod K Singh & Harpalsinh Chudasama, 2020. "Evaluating poverty alleviation strategies in a developing country," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Anwar Shah & Karim Khan, 2015. "Can We Solve the Issue of Poverty Without Solving the Issue of Conventional Economic Paradigm: A Critical Review," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 54(4), pages 671-683.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:37:y:2013:i:5:p:1035-1055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.