IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v37y2013i4p759-774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two conceptions of economics and maximisation

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo F. Crespo

Abstract

Economics has evolved from a 'domain-focused' conception, i.e. the study of specific kinds of human activities, to a 'scarcity-based' conception, i.e. the study of a particular approach to all human choices. It thus enlarged its domain and narrowed its perspective: instrumental maximising. This paper maintains that economics should be domain focused, with a core of scarcity-based analysis of its domain, integrated into a broader analysis. It also holds that the scarcity-based analysis of realities falling outside the economic domain is not economics, but rather a social science broader in respect to the field but narrower in respect to the analysis, and thus partial in its conclusions. Section 2 introduces these versions of economics, Section 3 links them to specific conceptions of rationality, Section 4 provides arguments for the paper's thesis and Section 5 deals with two related versions of maximisation and argues for adopting one of them. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo F. Crespo, 2013. "Two conceptions of economics and maximisation," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(4), pages 759-774.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:37:y:2013:i:4:p:759-774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bes076
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:37:y:2013:i:4:p:759-774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.