IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v36y2012i4p997-1017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Treasury and the New Cambridge School in the 1970s

Author

Listed:
  • John Maloney

Abstract

With the release of Treasury papers from the 1970s under the 30-year rule we have a much more complete picture of the dispute in the 1970s between the Treasury and the Cambridge Economic Policy Group (CEPG), especially given the role of three Cambridge economists--Nicholas Kaldor, Wynne Godley and Francis Cripps--as ministerial advisers at the time. The records show some eventual closing of the gap between the Treasury and the CEPG regarding the latter's proposition of stable private-sector NAFA (where NAFA stands for net acquisition of private sector assets) and its implications for demand management and the balance of payments. In contrast, the initial differences on counterinflation policy and, above all, on import controls versus free trade were wider at the end of the decade than at the start of it. Copyright The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • John Maloney, 2012. "The Treasury and the New Cambridge School in the 1970s," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 36(4), pages 997-1017.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:4:p:997-1017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/ber046
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter M. Jackson, 2014. "Thatcherism and the public sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 266-280, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:4:p:997-1017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.