IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v31y2007i1p25-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking economics: the potential contribution of the classics

Author

Listed:
  • José Castro Caldas
  • Ana Narciso Costa
  • Tom R. Burns

Abstract

Mainstream views only admit two solutions to social order--separation and coercion. Understanding why association, as a principle of order came to be excluded calls for an incursion into the history of economic ideas. Association was dismissed because it depends on commitment--a human capacity that cannot be accommodated within the rational choice framework. The classics were aware of that. We argue that rational choice, as it was originally conceived, was not meant to be applied to contexts charged with moral force and social dilemmas. We next highlight sympathy in the work of Adam Smith as the basis for normative commitment and association. Finally, we discuss association in the light of several classic contributions and stress the relevance of these contributions to present-day debates and socio-economic challenges. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • José Castro Caldas & Ana Narciso Costa & Tom R. Burns, 2007. "Rethinking economics: the potential contribution of the classics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 31(1), pages 25-40, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:31:y:2007:i:1:p:25-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bel003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Autar S. Dhesi, 2010. "Diaspora, social entrepreneurs and community development," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(9), pages 703-716, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:31:y:2007:i:1:p:25-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.