IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v26y2002i6p805-821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metatheory as the key to understanding: Schumpeter after Shionoya

Author

Listed:
  • M·rio da GraÁa Moura

Abstract

In his recent book, Yuichi Shionoya departs from previous Schumpeterian studies. He sets out to reconstruct Schumpeter's metatheoretical framework, which he argues is the key to a correct interpretation of his substantive writings. The centrepiece of this project is the thesis that Schumpeter has a coherent methodological position--instrumentalism--which consistently underpins his theoretical work. The present paper examines this thesis, and in so doing paves the way for an alternative hypothesis on Schumpeter. This hypothesis is based on Tony Lawson's work on the philosophy of economics. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • M·rio da GraÁa Moura, 2002. "Metatheory as the key to understanding: Schumpeter after Shionoya," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 26(6), pages 805-821, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:26:y:2002:i:6:p:805-821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mário Graça Moura, 2017. "Schumpeter and the meanings of rationality," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 115-138, January.
    2. Stefano Lucarelli & Alfonso Giuliani & Hervé Baron, 2019. "The past and future of the social sciences. A Schumpeterian theory of scientific development?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 43(6), pages 1701-1722.
    3. Mário Graça Moura, 2014. "Schumpeter and the meanings of rationality," FEP Working Papers 551, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    4. Agnieszka Lipieta & Andrzej Malawski, 2016. "Price versus quality competition: in search for Schumpeterian evolution mechanisms," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1137-1171, December.
    5. Turan Yay, 2021. "Method and scope in Joseph A. Schumpeter's economics: a pluralist perspective," Post-Print hal-03374881, HAL.
    6. Lucarelli, Stefano & Baron, Hervé, 2014. "On Schumpeter’s 'The Past and Future of Social Sciences'. A Schumpeterian Theory of Scientific Development?," MPRA Paper 60391, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Beniamino Callegari & Christophe Feder, 2022. "Entrepreneurship and the systemic consequences of epidemics: A literature review and emerging model," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1653-1684, December.
    8. Paul Lewis & Richard E. Wagner, 2017. "New Austrian macro theory: A call for inquiry," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:26:y:2002:i:6:p:805-821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.