IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v23y1999i3p337-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revolution and Counter-Revolution: Two Views of Unemployment

Author

Listed:
  • Chakravarty, S P
  • MacKay, R Ross

Abstract

There is a view in economics that Keynes did not have a microeconomic theory underpinning his explanation of macroeconomics. For example, Friedman (1970) even goes so far as to maintain that prices are arbitrary in Keynes's approach to economics. The conclusion which follows from this critique of Keynes is that Keynesian economics cannot explain the occurrence of unemployment in a market economy except by invoking ad hoc assumptions. It is argued in this paper that the above critique is based on a misunderstanding of the focus of the Keynesian explanation of unemployment. The focus in Keynes is not choice, but exclusion from choice. In conventional microeconomics, the concept of choice is not considered problematic. The observation that a particular action is taken is confused with the view that the action is voluntarily chosen. The Keynesian explanation entails an exploration of what the concept of voluntary choice means. Copyright 1999 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Chakravarty, S P & MacKay, R Ross, 1999. "Revolution and Counter-Revolution: Two Views of Unemployment," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 23(3), pages 337-351, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:23:y:1999:i:3:p:337-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shanti P. Chakravarty, 2016. "Edmund Phelps on Productivity Slowdown: Limits to Utilitarian Economics," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 357-365, December.
    2. R R MacKay, 1999. "Institute of Economic Research, University of Wales Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2DG, Wales," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(11), pages 1919-1934, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:23:y:1999:i:3:p:337-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.