IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v20y1996i1p91-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Morishima on Ricardo: Two Replies

Author

Listed:
  • Morishima, M

Abstract

Although David Ricardo does not use the concept 'general equilibrium,' his model may be described in terms of several sectors forming a consistent system. The author can find many similarities in formulations and conclusions between his and Leon Walras's economics, despite the fact that historians of economic thought generally tend to reject such a portrait of Ricardo. This paper is mainly a response to H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori's (1992) criticisms of M. Morishima's Ricardo, from Piero Sraffa's point of view. None of the criticisms is accepted. The author also defends himself from T. Peach whom he takes to be representative of the historians' view of Ricardo. (c) 1996 Academic Press Limited Copyright 1996 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Morishima, M, 1996. "Morishima on Ricardo: Two Replies," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 20(1), pages 91-109, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:20:y:1996:i:1:p:91-109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Freni, Giuseppe & Salvadori, Neri & Signorino, Rodolfo, 2019. "Structural change in a Ricardian world economy: The role of extensive rent," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 277-282.
    2. D'Alessandro, Simone & Salvadori, Neri, 2008. "Pasinetti versus Rebelo: Two different models or just one?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 65(3-4), pages 547-554, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:20:y:1996:i:1:p:91-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.