IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v12y1988i3p313-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Limits to the Expansion of Neoclassical Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolaides, Phedon

Abstract

The expansion of neoclassical economics into traditionally noneconomic subjects has been largely defended on the grounds that it yields interesting insights and testable propositions. This paper examines that expansion in terms of a more general trend towards greater harmonization of the behavioral and institutional assumptions that provide the foundation of neoclassical models. Such harmonization is itself based on the assumption that the acquisition of knowledge is a fully rational process. This paper argues that there are inherent limits to that process and, by implication, to those attempts that seek to explain all of human behavior using a single model. Copyright 1988 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolaides, Phedon, 1988. "Limits to the Expansion of Neoclassical Economics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 12(3), pages 313-328, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:12:y:1988:i:3:p:313-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mónica Guillén Royo, 2003. "Hacia una revisión crítica del análisis neoclásico del consumo: una alternativa basada en las necesidades," Revista de Economía Crítica, Asociación de Economía Crítica, vol. 1, pages 95-111.
    2. Franck Bailly, 2022. "When mainstream economics does human resource management: a critique of personnel economics’ prescriptive ambition," Post-Print hal-03711945, HAL.
    3. Spencer, David A, 2000. "The Demise of Radical Political Economics? An Essay on the Evolution of a Theory of Capitalist Production," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 24(5), pages 543-564, September.
    4. Anton D. Lowenberg, 1990. "Neoclassical Economics as a Theory of Politics and Institutions," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 9(3), pages 619-639, Winter.
    5. Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 2003. "The microfoundations of macroeconomics: an evolutionary perspective," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 27(1), pages 65-84, January.
    6. Maximiliano, 2018. "Determinantes de la demanda por entradas a partidos de fútbol de primera división. El caso uruguayo para la década 2006 - 2016," Documentos de Investigación Estudiantil (students working papers) 18-04, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    7. Frank Bailly, 2022. "When mainstream economics does human resource management: a critique of personnel economics' prescriptive ambition," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 75(301), pages 103-117.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:12:y:1988:i:3:p:313-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.