IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v99y2012i3p631-648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An efficient method of estimation for longitudinal surveys with monotone missing data

Author

Listed:
  • Ming Zhou
  • Jae Kwang Kim

Abstract

Panel attrition is frequently encountered in panel sample surveys. When it is related to the observed study variable, the classical approach of nonresponse adjustment using a covariate-dependent dropout mechanism can be biased. We consider an efficient method of estimation with monotone panel attrition when the response probability depends on the previous values of study variable as well as other covariates. Because of the monotone structure of the missing pattern, the response mechanism is missing at random. The proposed estimator is asymptotically optimal in the sense that it minimizes the asymptotic variance of a class of estimators that can be written as a linear combination of the unbiased estimators of the panel estimates for each wave, and incorporates all available information using generalized least squares. Variance estimation is discussed and results from a simulation study are presented. Copyright 2012, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming Zhou & Jae Kwang Kim, 2012. "An efficient method of estimation for longitudinal surveys with monotone missing data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 99(3), pages 631-648.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:99:y:2012:i:3:p:631-648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/ass026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhan Liu & Chun Yip Yau, 2022. "A propensity score adjustment method for longitudinal time series models under nonignorable nonresponse," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 317-342, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:99:y:2012:i:3:p:631-648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.