IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v89y2002i1p238-244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple imputation methods for testing treatment differences in survival distributions with missing cause of failure

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasios A. Tsiatis

Abstract

We propose a method for comparing survival distributions when cause-of-failure information is missing for some individuals. We use multiple imputation to impute missing causes of failure, where the probability that a missing cause is that of interest may depend on auxiliary covariates, and combine log-rank statistics computed from several 'completed' datasets into a test statistic that achieves asymptotically the nominal level. Simulations demonstrate the relevance of the theory in finite samples. Copyright Biometrika Trust 2002, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasios A. Tsiatis, 2002. "Multiple imputation methods for testing treatment differences in survival distributions with missing cause of failure," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(1), pages 238-244, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:89:y:2002:i:1:p:238-244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Qihua & Liu, Wei & Liu, Chunling, 2009. "Probability density estimation for survival data with censoring indicators missing at random," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(5), pages 835-850, May.
    2. Subramanian, Sundarraman, 2011. "Multiple imputations and the missing censoring indicator model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 105-117, January.
    3. Bandyopadhyay, Dipankar & Jácome, M. Amalia, 2016. "Comparing conditional survival functions with missing population marks in a competing risks model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 150-160.
    4. Qihua Wang & Gregg Dinse & Chunling Liu, 2012. "Hazard function estimation with cause-of-death data missing at random," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 64(2), pages 415-438, April.
    5. Subramanian, Sundarraman, 2009. "The multiple imputations based Kaplan-Meier estimator," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(18), pages 1906-1914, September.
    6. Mondal, Shoubhik & Subramanian, Sundarraman, 2014. "Model assisted Cox regression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 281-303.
    7. Subramanian, Sundarraman, 2016. "Bootstrap likelihood ratio confidence bands for survival functions under random censorship and its semiparametric extension," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 58-81.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:89:y:2002:i:1:p:238-244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.