IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i2p364-375..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spoiled for choice: number of signalers constrains mate choice based on acoustic signals

Author

Listed:
  • Jessie C Tanner
  • Leigh W Simmons

Abstract

Animal communication mediates social interactions with important fitness consequences for individuals. Receivers use signals to detect and discriminate among potential mates. Extensive research effort has focused on how receiver behavior imposes selection on signalers and signals. However, animals communicate in socially and physically complex environments with important biotic and abiotic features that are often excluded from controlled laboratory experiments, including noise. “Noise” is any factor that prevents signal detection and discrimination. The noise caused by aggregates of acoustic signalers is a well-known impediment to receivers, but how many individual signalers are required to produce the emergent effects of chorus noise on receiver behavior? In Teleogryllus oceanicus, the Australian field cricket, we assayed female preferences for a temporal property of male advertisement signals, the number of long chirp pulses, using two-, four-, six-, and eight-choice phonotaxis experiments. We found that, as the number of individual signalers increased, receivers became less likely to respond phonotactically and less likely to express their well-documented preference for more long chirp pulses. We found that very few individual signalers can create a sufficiently noisy environment, due either to acoustic interference or choice overload, to substantially impair female preference expression. Our results suggest that receivers may not always be able to express their well-documented mating preferences in nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessie C Tanner & Leigh W Simmons, 2022. "Spoiled for choice: number of signalers constrains mate choice based on acoustic signals," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(2), pages 364-375.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:2:p:364-375.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arab136
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jessie C Tanner & Mark A Bee, 2019. "Within-individual variation in sexual displays: signal or noise?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 80-91.
    2. Liam R. Dougherty & David M. Shuker, 2015. "The effect of experimental design on the measurement of mate choice: a meta-analysis," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 311-319.
    3. Darren Rebar & Nathan W. Bailey & Marlene Zuk, 2009. "Courtship song's role during female mate choice in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1307-1314.
    4. Adam M Bent & Thomas C Ings & Sophie L Mowles & Ulrika Candolin, 2021. "Anthropogenic noise disrupts mate choice behaviors in female Gryllus bimaculatus [Aggressiveness, territoriality, and sexual behavior in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(2), pages 201-210.
    5. Leigh W. Simmons & Melissa L. Thomas & Frederick W. Simmons & Marlene Zuk, 2013. "Female preferences for acoustic and olfactory signals during courtship: male crickets send multiple messages," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1099-1107.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicola-Anne J Rutkowski & Yong Zhi Foo & Therésa M Jones & Kathryn B McNamara, 2023. "Age, but not an immune challenge, triggers terminal investment in the Pacific field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 468-479.
    2. Jacob D Berson & Leigh W Simmons, 2018. "Sexual selection across sensory modalities: female choice of male behavioral and gustatory displays," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(5), pages 1096-1104.
    3. Oded Berger-Tal & Alison L Greggor & Biljana Macura & Carrie Ann Adams & Arden Blumenthal & Amos Bouskila & Ulrika Candolin & Carolina Doran & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Kiyoko M Gotanda & Catherine , 2019. "Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 1-8.
    4. John O MartinIII & Nancy Tyler Burley, 2021. "Elucidating mutual mate choice: effects of trial design on preferences of male zebra finches," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1306-1320.
    5. Alice Charalabidis & François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont & Sandrine Petit & David A Bohan, 2017. "Risk of predation makes foragers less choosy about their food," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:2:p:364-375.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.