IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i5p1099-1107..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female preferences for acoustic and olfactory signals during courtship: male crickets send multiple messages

Author

Listed:
  • Leigh W. Simmons
  • Melissa L. Thomas
  • Frederick W. Simmons
  • Marlene Zuk

Abstract

Males can produce complex sexual signals, often in different sensory modalities. The information conveyed by multiple signals, and the degree to which multiple signals interact in influencing female mating decisions, is not well understood. Male crickets produce 2 signals during courtship, an acoustic signal or courtship song, and a contact olfactory signal in the form of a blend of hydrocarbon compounds secreted onto the cuticle. We used selection analyses to examine the form of female preferences acting on these 2 sexual signals in the Australian field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Both signals were subject to significant nonlinear preferences. Cuticular hydrocarbon profiles were subject to disruptive female preferences, with males exhibiting average cuticular hydrocarbon profiles experiencing the lowest mating success. In contrast, courtship song was subject to directional preferences, whereby males with high sound content in the trill element of the song, and to a lesser extent the chirp element, had the greatest mating success. Across males, the attractiveness of cuticular hydrocarbons was not correlated with the attractiveness of courtship songs, indicating that these signals convey multiple messages. Previous work on T. oceanicus suggests that courtship song may be a condition-dependent signal of good genes, whereas cuticular hydrocarbon profiles may provide cues to genetic compatibility. We found that olfactory and acoustic cues had equal weight in predicting the probability of male mating success. Interactions between cuticular hydrocarbon and courtship song attractiveness may help explain the maintenance of genetic variation found in these sexual traits.

Suggested Citation

  • Leigh W. Simmons & Melissa L. Thomas & Frederick W. Simmons & Marlene Zuk, 2013. "Female preferences for acoustic and olfactory signals during courtship: male crickets send multiple messages," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1099-1107.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:5:p:1099-1107.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacob D Berson & Leigh W Simmons, 2018. "Sexual selection across sensory modalities: female choice of male behavioral and gustatory displays," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(5), pages 1096-1104.
    2. Jessie C Tanner & Leigh W Simmons, 2022. "Spoiled for choice: number of signalers constrains mate choice based on acoustic signals," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(2), pages 364-375.
    3. Nicola-Anne J Rutkowski & Yong Zhi Foo & Therésa M Jones & Kathryn B McNamara, 2023. "Age, but not an immune challenge, triggers terminal investment in the Pacific field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 468-479.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:5:p:1099-1107.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.