IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v28y2017i5p1248-1255..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Camouflaging moving objects: crypsis and masquerade

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna R Hall
  • Roland Baddeley
  • Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
  • Adam J Shohet
  • Innes C Cuthill

Abstract

Lay SummaryWe show that for objects moving in groups, spotting one that is a different shape is harder when the objects are similarly patterned. The difficulty of spotting the odd-one-out is further enhanced by matching the background and being in larger groups. So, even though motion ‘breaks’ camouflage, being camouflaged can help group-living animals reduce the risk of being singled out for attack by predators.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna R Hall & Roland Baddeley & Nicholas E Scott-Samuel & Adam J Shohet & Innes C Cuthill, 2017. "Camouflaging moving objects: crypsis and masquerade," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1248-1255.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:28:y:2017:i:5:p:1248-1255.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arx085
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benedict G. Hogan & Innes C. Cuthill & Nicholas E. Scott-Samuel, 2016. "Dazzle camouflage, target tracking, and the confusion effect," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(5), pages 1547-1551.
    2. C.C. Ioannou & C.R. Tosh & L. Neville & J. Krause, 2008. "The confusion effect--from neural networks to reduced predation risk," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(1), pages 126-130.
    3. John Skelhorn & Hannah M. Rowland & Michael P. Speed & Leoni De Wert & Lucy Quinn & Jon Delf & Graeme D. Ruxton, 2010. "Size-dependent misclassification of masquerading prey," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(6), pages 1344-1348.
    4. Marina Dimitrova & Sami Merilaita, 2012. "Prey pattern regularity and background complexity affect detectability of background-matching prey," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 384-390.
    5. Graeme D. Ruxton & Andrew L. Jackson & Colin R. Tosh, 2007. "Confusion of predators does not rely on specialist coordinated behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(3), pages 590-596.
    6. Alan B. Bond & Alan C. Kamil, 2002. "Visual predators select for crypticity and polymorphism in virtual prey," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6872), pages 609-613, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Callum Duffield & Christos C Ioannou, 2017. "Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1283-1292.
    2. Ossi Nokelainen & Sanni A. Silvasti & Sharon Y. Strauss & Niklas Wahlberg & Johanna Mappes, 2024. "Predator selection on phenotypic variability of cryptic and aposematic moths," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Frédéric B. Muratori & Angéla Rouyar & Thierry Hance, 2014. "Clonal variation in aggregation and defensive behavior in pea aphids," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 901-908.
    4. John Skelhorn & Graeme D. Ruxton, 2013. "Size-dependent microhabitat selection by masquerading prey," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 89-97.
    5. Melia G. Nafus & Jennifer M. Germano & Jeanette A. Perry & Brian D. Todd & Allyson Walsh & Ronald R. Swaisgood, 2015. "Hiding in plain sight: a study on camouflage and habitat selection in a slow-moving desert herbivore," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1389-1394.
    6. Gopal Murali & Ullasa Kodandaramaiah & John FitzpatrickHandling editor, 2018. "Body size and evolution of motion dazzle coloration in lizards," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 79-86.
    7. Caroline H. Brighton & Laura N. Kloepper & Christian D. Harding & Lucy Larkman & Kathryn McGowan & Lillias Zusi & Graham K. Taylor, 2022. "Raptors avoid the confusion effect by targeting fixed points in dense aerial prey aggregations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. van Leeuwen, E. & Jansen, V.A.A., 2010. "Evolutionary consequences of a search image," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 49-55.
    9. Elizabeth G Postema & Mia K Lippey & Tiernan Armstrong-Ingram, 2023. "Color under pressure: how multiple factors shape defensive coloration," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(1), pages 1-13.
    10. Changku Kang & Martin Stevens & Jong-yeol Moon & Sang-Im Lee & Piotr G. Jablonski, 2015. "Camouflage through behavior in moths: the role of background matching and disruptive coloration," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(1), pages 45-54.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:28:y:2017:i:5:p:1248-1255.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.