IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i4p1156-1163..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Females as mobile resources: communal roosts promote the adoption of lek breeding in a temperate bat

Author

Listed:
  • Cory A. Toth
  • Todd E. Dennis
  • David E. Pattemore
  • Stuart Parsons

Abstract

Males of lek-breeding species defend clustered territories from which they display to visiting females. However, the mechanisms leading to the adoption of clustered male display sites are often unknown. In this study, we examined the possibility of a resource-based lek in New Zealand’s lesser short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata) (Mammalia: Chiroptera), by assessing the placement of "singing roosts" used by males in relation to communal roosting sites used by females. The "resource-based lek" model posits that males settle near resources required by females to increase female encounter rates. For most bat species, where females are highly mobile and widely dispersed across landscapes while foraging, communal daytime roosts dominated by females may represent such a resource. Through use of video footage, spatial analyses of singing-roost locations, and passive-integrated transponder tags we confirmed that M. tuberculata employs a lek mating system. We found that male singing roosts were significantly clustered in space, were defended by resident individuals, and were visited by females (who did not receive resources from males) for mating purposes. Transponder records also indicated that some singing roosts were shared between multiple males. Spatial logistic regression indicated that singing-roost locations were associated with communal roosting sites. Communal roosts are selected based on criteria independent of the locations of singing roosts, suggesting that males responded to the location of communal roosts and not the reverse. Mystacina tuberculata thus provides evidence of a resource-based lek, and is only the second bat species worldwide confirmed to use a lek-mating system.

Suggested Citation

  • Cory A. Toth & Todd E. Dennis & David E. Pattemore & Stuart Parsons, 2015. "Females as mobile resources: communal roosts promote the adoption of lek breeding in a temperate bat," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(4), pages 1156-1163.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:1156-1163.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv070
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baddeley, Adrian & Turner, Rolf, 2005. "spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 12(i06).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arii, Ken & Caspersen, John P. & Jones, Trevor A. & Thomas, Sean C., 2008. "A selection harvesting algorithm for use in spatially explicit individual-based forest simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 251-266.
    2. Frank Davenport, 2017. "Estimating standard errors in spatial panel models with time varying spatial correlation," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96, pages 155-177, March.
    3. Leandro, Camila & Jay-Robert, Pierre & Mériguet, Bruno & Houard, Xavier & Renner, Ian W., 2020. "Is my sdm good enough? insights from a citizen science dataset in a point process modeling framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    4. Vijay Rajagopal & Gregory Bass & Cameron G Walker & David J Crossman & Amorita Petzer & Anthony Hickey & Ivo Siekmann & Masahiko Hoshijima & Mark H Ellisman & Edmund J Crampin & Christian Soeller, 2015. "Examination of the Effects of Heterogeneous Organization of RyR Clusters, Myofibrils and Mitochondria on Ca2+ Release Patterns in Cardiomyocytes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-31, September.
    5. Christoph Lambio & Tillman Schmitz & Richard Elson & Jeffrey Butler & Alexandra Roth & Silke Feller & Nicolai Savaskan & Tobia Lakes, 2023. "Exploring the Spatial Relative Risk of COVID-19 in Berlin-Neukölln," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Abdollah Jalilian, 2017. "Modelling and classification of species abundance: a case study in the Barro Colorado Island plot," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(13), pages 2401-2409, October.
    7. Éric Marcon & Florence Puech, 2023. "Mapping distributions in non-homogeneous space with distance-based methods [Cartographie des distributions dans un espace non homogène à l'aide de méthodes basées sur la distance]," Post-Print hal-04345149, HAL.
    8. Eric Marcon & Florence Puech, 2012. "A typology of distance-based measures of spatial concentration," Working Papers halshs-00679993, HAL.
    9. Davies, Tilman M. & Jones, Khair & Hazelton, Martin L., 2016. "Symmetric adaptive smoothing regimens for estimation of the spatial relative risk function," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 12-28.
    10. Sillero, Neftalí & Campos, João Carlos & Arenas-Castro, Salvador & Barbosa, A.Márcia, 2023. "A curated list of R packages for ecological niche modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    11. Martín, Gerardo & Yáñez-Arenas, Carlos & Chiappa-Carrara, Xavier, 2022. "Discrepancies between point process models and environmental envelopes identify the niche centroid – geography configuration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 469(C).
    12. Roger S. Bivand, 2021. "Progress in the R ecosystem for representing and handling spatial data," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 515-546, October.
    13. Andrew J Edelman, 2012. "Positive Interactions between Desert Granivores: Localized Facilitation of Harvester Ants by Kangaroo Rats," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-9, February.
    14. Amanda S. Hering & Sean Bair, 2014. "Characterizing spatial and chronological target selection of serial offenders," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 123-140, January.
    15. Nikhil Kaza & T. William Lester & Daniel A. Rodriguez, 2013. "The Spatio-temporal Clustering of Green Buildings in the United States," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(16), pages 3262-3282, December.
    16. Tilman M. Davies & Martin L. Hazelton, 2013. "Assessing minimum contrast parameter estimation for spatial and spatiotemporal log‐Gaussian Cox processes," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 67(4), pages 355-389, November.
    17. Lister, Andrew J. & Leites, Laura P., 2018. "Modeling and simulation of tree spatial patterns in an oak-hickory forest with a modular, hierarchical spatial point process framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 378(C), pages 37-45.
    18. Michal Gallay & Ján Kaňuk & Jaroslav Hofierka, 2015. "Capacity of photovoltaic power plants in the Czech Republic," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 480-486, May.
    19. Christophe Ange Napoléon Biscio & Frédéric Lavancier, 2017. "Contrast Estimation for Parametric Stationary Determinantal Point Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(1), pages 204-229, March.
    20. Frédéric Lavancier & Jesper Møller, 2016. "Modelling Aggregation on the Large Scale and Regularity on the Small Scale in Spatial Point Pattern Datasets," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(2), pages 587-609, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:1156-1163.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.