IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i6p1363-1368..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Immediate, independent adjustment of call pitch and amplitude in response to varying background noise by silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis)

Author

Listed:
  • Dominique A. Potvin
  • Raoul A. Mulder

Abstract

Many birds raise the pitch of their vocalizations in urban environments, a shift generally attributed to avoidance of low frequencies vulnerable to masking by anthropogenic noise (acoustic adaptation hypothesis [AAH]). However, high frequencies could just be an incidental byproduct of singing more loudly (Lombard hypothesis). If birds cope with background noise by singing more loudly and increases in frequency are byproducts of increased amplitudes, they should respond with louder songs (and increased pitch) to either high- (HFN) or low-frequency noise (LFN) of similar amplitude. However, if birds adaptively adjust frequency to minimize interference, they should increase frequency in response to LFN but decrease it in response to HFN. We exposed silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis), which use higher songs and calls in urban areas, to high- and low-frequency background noise of standardized amplitude. Silvereyes from both rural and urban areas exposed to HFN responded by lowering the minimum frequencies of their calls, and this shift was independent of call amplitude, which increased in all noise treatments. These findings support the AAH. Calls during HFN treatments were also longer than those made during quiet treatments. Our results suggest that silvereyes are capable of flexible adjustments of call frequency, amplitude, and duration to maximize signal-to-noise ratio in noisy environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique A. Potvin & Raoul A. Mulder, 2013. "Immediate, independent adjustment of call pitch and amplitude in response to varying background noise by silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(6), pages 1363-1368.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:6:p:1363-1368.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art075
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mieke C. Zwart & Jonathon C. Dunn & Philip J.K. McGowan & Mark J. Whittingham, 2016. "Wind farm noise suppresses territorial defense behavior in a songbird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 101-108.
    2. Mario Gallego-Abenza & Nicolas Mathevon & David Wheatcroft & Ulrika Candolin, 2020. "Experience modulates an insect’s response to anthropogenic noise," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(1), pages 90-96.
    3. Swaroop Patankar & Ravi Jambhekar & Kulbhushansingh Ramesh Suryawanshi & Harini Nagendra, 2021. "Which Traits Influence Bird Survival in the City? A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:6:p:1363-1368.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.