IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i2p92-d484054.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Traits Influence Bird Survival in the City? A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Swaroop Patankar

    (Center for Climate Change and Sustainability, Azim Premji University, Bengaluru 562125, India)

  • Ravi Jambhekar

    (Center for Climate Change and Sustainability, Azim Premji University, Bengaluru 562125, India)

  • Kulbhushansingh Ramesh Suryawanshi

    (Nature Conservation Foundation, 1311, ‘Amritha’, 12th A Main, Vijayanagar 1st Stage, Mysore 570017, India
    Snow Leopard Trust, 4649 Sunnyside Avenue North, Suite 325, Seattle, WA 98103, USA)

  • Harini Nagendra

    (Center for Climate Change and Sustainability, Azim Premji University, Bengaluru 562125, India)

Abstract

Urbanization poses a major threat to biodiversity worldwide. We focused on birds as a well-studied taxon of interest, in order to review literature on traits that influence responses to urbanization. We review 226 papers that were published between 1979 and 2020, and aggregate information on five major groups of traits that have been widely studied: ecological traits, life history, physiology, behavior and genetic traits. Some robust findings on trait changes in individual species as well as bird communities emerge. A lack of specific food and shelter resources has led to the urban bird community being dominated by generalist species, while specialist species show decline. Urbanized birds differ in the behavioral traits, showing an increase in song frequency and amplitude, and bolder behavior, as compared to rural populations of the same species. Differential food resources and predatory pressure results in changes in life history traits, including prolonged breeding duration, and increases in clutch and brood size to compensate for lower survival. Other species-specific changes include changes in hormonal state, body state, and genetic differences from rural populations. We identify gaps in research, with a paucity of studies in tropical cities and a need for greater examination of traits that influence persistence and success in native vs. introduced populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Swaroop Patankar & Ravi Jambhekar & Kulbhushansingh Ramesh Suryawanshi & Harini Nagendra, 2021. "Which Traits Influence Bird Survival in the City? A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:92-:d:484054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/92/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/92/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Moiron & Cesar González-Lagos & Hans Slabbekoorn & Daniel Sol, 2015. "Singing in the city: high song frequencies are no guarantee for urban success in birds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(3), pages 843-850.
    2. Masaru Hasegawa & Russell A. Ligon & Mathieu Giraudeau & Mamoru Watanabe & Kevin J. McGraw, 2014. "Urban and colorful male house finches are less aggressive," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(3), pages 641-649.
    3. Diogo S. M. Samia & Shinichi Nakagawa & Fausto Nomura & Thiago F. Rangel & Daniel T. Blumstein, 2015. "Increased tolerance to humans among disturbed wildlife," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, December.
    4. David A. Luther & Jennifer Phillips & Elizabeth P. Derryberry, 2016. "Not so sexy in the city: urban birds adjust songs to noise but compromise vocal performance," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 332-340.
    5. Mario Díaz & Antonio Parra & Clemente Gallardo, 2011. "Serins respond to anthropogenic noise by increasing vocal activity," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(2), pages 332-336.
    6. Dana L Moseley & Jennifer N Phillips & Elizabeth P Derryberry & David A Luther & Ulrika Candolin, 2019. "Evidence for differing trajectories of songs in urban and rural populations," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(6), pages 1734-1742.
    7. Jean-Nicolas Audet & Simon Ducatez & Louis Lefebvre, 2016. "The town bird and the country bird: problem solving and immunocompetence vary with urbanization," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(2), pages 637-644.
    8. Dominique A. Potvin & Raoul A. Mulder, 2013. "Immediate, independent adjustment of call pitch and amplitude in response to varying background noise by silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(6), pages 1363-1368.
    9. Desirée L. Narango & Amanda D. Rodewald, 2016. "Urban-associated drivers of song variation along a rural–urban gradient," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(2), pages 608-616.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessio Russo & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2021. "Urban Ecosystem Services: Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Future Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-4, August.
    2. Hyun-Woo Kim & Jun-Kyu Park & Woong-Bae Park & Yuno Do, 2023. "Urbanization Reduces the Nest Size of Barn Swallow ( Hirundo rustica ) in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-11, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario Gallego-Abenza & Nicolas Mathevon & David Wheatcroft & Ulrika Candolin, 2020. "Experience modulates an insect’s response to anthropogenic noise," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(1), pages 90-96.
    2. Hannah Harris & Katie K Y Wat & Peter B Banks & Aaron Greenville & Clare McArthur, 2023. "Grow up, be persistent, and stay focused: keys for solving foraging problems by free-ranging possums," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(5), pages 790-803.
    3. Peter Mikula & Oldřich Tomášek & Dušan Romportl & Timothy K. Aikins & Jorge E. Avendaño & Bukola D. A. Braimoh-Azaki & Adams Chaskda & Will Cresswell & Susan J. Cunningham & Svein Dale & Gabriela R. F, 2023. "Bird tolerance to humans in open tropical ecosystems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Mieke C. Zwart & Jonathon C. Dunn & Philip J.K. McGowan & Mark J. Whittingham, 2016. "Wind farm noise suppresses territorial defense behavior in a songbird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 101-108.
    5. Jonas Stiegler & Cara A. Gallagher & Robert Hering & Thomas Müller & Marlee Tucker & Marco Apollonio & Janosch Arnold & Nancy A. Barker & Leon Barthel & Bruno Bassano & Floris M. van Beest & Jerrold L, 2024. "Mammals show faster recovery from capture and tagging in human-disturbed landscapes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Nicholas M Sutton & Michael A Weston & Patrick J Guay & Jenna Tregoweth & James P O’Dwyer, 2021. "A Bayesian optimal escape model reveals bird species differ in their capacity to habituate to humans," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1064-1074.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:92-:d:484054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.