IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i4p926-934..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nest size and aromatic plants in the nest as sexually selected female traits in blue tits

Author

Listed:
  • Gustavo Tomás
  • Santiago Merino
  • Josué Martínez-de la Puente
  • Juan Moreno
  • Judith Morales
  • Juan Rivero-de Aguilar

Abstract

Besides the direct functionality of nests driven by natural selection, accumulating evidence shows that nest building behaviors and nests may also evolve under sexual selection. Empirical research on the potential role of nests or nest features as sexual signals, however, is comparatively scarce for avian species in which the female is the only sex involved in its construction because of a male bias in the study of sexual traits, even though maternally built nests may be more common than paternally and biparentally built nests. In blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus, females alone build nests and add aromatic plants to them. We manipulated nest size and amount of aromatic plants in the nest to assess subsequent male effort and risk taking during provisioning of nestlings as indices of differential allocation. Risk taking was assessed through trappability indices of males at the nest-box when provisioning nestlings. Although male provisioning rates did not differ between experimental groups, male risk taking during provisioning was significantly lower in nests reduced in size than in control and enlarged nests, and it was significantly higher in nests supplied with aromatic plants than in control nests. Females showed nonsignificant trends to increase their provisioning effort in reduced nests, probably to compensate reduced male investment. Finally, female provisioning rates and especially male risk taking had a major positive impact on reproductive success and thereby on female fitness. In summary, this study (and previous evidence) suggests that nest size and aromatic plants in blue tit nests are used by females as sexual signals to elicit differential allocation in males. This study adds to the scarce evidence in favor of nests or nest materials acting as sexually selected traits regarding female signaling.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustavo Tomás & Santiago Merino & Josué Martínez-de la Puente & Juan Moreno & Judith Morales & Juan Rivero-de Aguilar, 2013. "Nest size and aromatic plants in the nest as sexually selected female traits in blue tits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 926-934.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:4:p:926-934.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rufus A. Johnstone & Camilla A. Hinde, 2006. "Negotiation over offspring care--how should parents respond to each other's efforts?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(5), pages 818-827, September.
    2. Juan José Soler & Manuel Martín-Vivaldi & Claudy Haussy & Anders Pape Møller, 2007. "Intra- and interspecific relationships between nest size and immunity," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(4), pages 781-791.
    3. Juan José Sanz & Vicente García-Navas, 2011. "Nest ornamentation in blue tits: is feather carrying ability a male status signal?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(2), pages 240-247.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark C Mainwaring & Jenő Nagy & Mark E Hauber, 2021. "Sex-specific contributions to nest building in birds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1075-1085.
    2. Juan G Rubalcaba & Daniel Fuentes & José P Veiga & Vicente Polo, 2017. "Nest decoration as social signals by males and females: greenery and feathers in starling colonies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1369-1375.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark C Mainwaring & Jenő Nagy & Mark E Hauber, 2021. "Sex-specific contributions to nest building in birds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1075-1085.
    2. Hannes Rosenbusch & Maya Aghaei & Anthony M. Evans & Marcel Zeelenberg, 2021. "Psychological trait inferences from women’s clothing: human and machine prediction," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 479-501, November.
    3. Daiping Wang & Wenyuan Zhang & Shuai Yang & Xiang-Yi Li Richter, 2023. "Sex differences in avian parental care patterns vary across the breeding cycle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Reetta Hämäläinen & Panu Välimäki & Jukka T Forsman, 2023. "Size of an interspecific competitor may be a source of information in reproductive decisions," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(1), pages 33-41.
    5. Frank Groenewoud & Sjouke A Kingma & Kat Bebbington & David S Richardson & Jan Komdeur, 2019. "Experimentally induced antipredator responses are mediated by social and environmental factors," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 986-992.
    6. Dieter Lukas, 2013. "Caring for Offspring in a World of Cheats," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-3, March.
    7. James L. Savage & Andrew F. Russell & Rufus A. Johnstone, 2013. "Maternal costs in offspring production affect investment rules in joint rearing," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 750-758.
    8. Martin Bulla & Mihai Valcu & Anne L. Rutten & Bart Kempenaers, 2014. "Biparental incubation patterns in a high-Arctic breeding shorebird: how do pairs divide their duties?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 152-164.
    9. Alfréd Trnka & Tomáš Grim, 2013. "To compensate or not to compensate: testing the negotiation model in the context of nest defense," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 223-228.
    10. Rufus A. Johnstone & Andrea Manica & Annette L. Fayet & Mary Caswell Stoddard & Miguel A. Rodriguez-Gironés & Camilla A. Hinde, 2014. "Reciprocity and conditional cooperation between great tit parents," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 216-222.
    11. Erol Akçay & Joan Roughgarden, 2009. "The Perfect Family: Decision Making in Biparental Care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-10, October.
    12. Tina A Barbasch & Rebecca Branconi & Robin Francis & Madison Pacaro & Maya Srinivasan & Geoffrey P Jones & Peter M Buston, 2021. "Negotiations over parental care: a test of alternative hypotheses in the clown anemonefish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1256-1265.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:4:p:926-934.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.